 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Google Beta User
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:02 am Post subject: Observation on Dem Debate |
|
|
These things are not about the issue or specifics.
It always comes down to perception.
IMO, Obama made Clinton look rather petty and silly at times i.e. like
that line when he said apparently all his voters are delusional.
And she comes across as shrill like when she was going on about
healthcare.
Again, the specifics or who is "right" on those issues is secondary to
how they're coming across.
Archived from group: rec>sport>football>college |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan S.
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 55
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 5:17 am Post subject: Re: Observation on Dem Debate |
|
|
Google Beta User submitted this idea :
> These things are not about the issue or specifics.
>
> It always comes down to perception.
>
> IMO, Obama made Clinton look rather petty and silly at times i.e. like
> that line when he said apparently all his voters are delusional.
>
> And she comes across as shrill like when she was going on about
> healthcare.
>
> Again, the specifics or who is "right" on those issues is secondary to
> how they're coming across.
Hillary won't even get the woman's vote amongst the liberalish people I
know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lein
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:34 am Post subject: Re: Observation on Dem Debate |
|
|
On Feb 21, 9:02 pm, Google Beta User wrote:
> These things are not about the issue or specifics.
>
> It always comes down to perception.
>
> IMO, Obama made Clinton look rather petty and silly at times i.e. like
> that line when he said apparently all his voters are delusional.
>
> And she comes across as shrill like when she was going on about
> healthcare.
>
> Again, the specifics or who is "right" on those issues is secondary to
> how they're coming across.
Hillary's problem is that she really can't attack Obama on substance
because Hillary share she same liberal beliefs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Calmness of RSPW [was
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:36 am Post subject: Re: Observation on Dem Debate |
|
|
In article
,
lein wrote:
> On Feb 21, 9:02 pm, Google Beta User wrote:
> > These things are not about the issue or specifics.
> >
> > It always comes down to perception.
> >
> > IMO, Obama made Clinton look rather petty and silly at times i.e. like
> > that line when he said apparently all his voters are delusional.
> >
> > And she comes across as shrill like when she was going on about
> > healthcare.
> >
> > Again, the specifics or who is "right" on those issues is secondary to
> > how they're coming across.
>
>
> Hillary's problem is that she really can't attack Obama on substance
> because Hillary share she same liberal beliefs.
And that he doesn't share her authoritarian beliefs.
--
Monkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trijcomm
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 3:43 am Post subject: Re: Observation on Dem Debate |
|
|
On Feb 22, 12:36 am, "The Calmness of RSPW [was LH]"
wrote:
> In article
> ,
>
>
>
>
>
> lein wrote:
> > On Feb 21, 9:02 pm, Google Beta User wrote:
> > > These things are not about the issue or specifics.
>
> > > It always comes down to perception.
>
> > > IMO, Obama made Clinton look rather petty and silly at times i.e. like
> > > that line when he said apparently all his voters are delusional.
>
> > > And she comes across as shrill like when she was going on about
> > > healthcare.
>
> > > Again, the specifics or who is "right" on those issues is secondary to
> > > how they're coming across.
>
> > Hillary's problem is that she really can't attack Obama on substance
> > because Hillary share she same liberal beliefs.
>
> And that he doesn't share her authoritarian beliefs.
>
> --
> Monkeys.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ha! Oh yes he does! His "let's all come together" garbage means "if
you oppose me, you are holding back progress." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Calmness of RSPW [was
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject: Re: Observation on Dem Debate |
|
|
In article
,
trijcomm wrote:
> On Feb 22, 12:36 am, "The Calmness of RSPW [was LH]"
> wrote:
> > In article
> > ,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > lein wrote:
> > > On Feb 21, 9:02 pm, Google Beta User wrote:
> > > > These things are not about the issue or specifics.
> >
> > > > It always comes down to perception.
> >
> > > > IMO, Obama made Clinton look rather petty and silly at times i.e. like
> > > > that line when he said apparently all his voters are delusional.
> >
> > > > And she comes across as shrill like when she was going on about
> > > > healthcare.
> >
> > > > Again, the specifics or who is "right" on those issues is secondary to
> > > > how they're coming across.
> >
> > > Hillary's problem is that she really can't attack Obama on substance
> > > because Hillary share she same liberal beliefs.
> >
> > And that he doesn't share her authoritarian beliefs.
> >
> > --
> > Monkeys.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Ha! Oh yes he does! His "let's all come together" garbage means "if
> you oppose me, you are holding back progress."
He's authoritarian, yes. But not nearly to that same extent nor to
the same extent as the majority of the other candidates are. Look at his
healthplan compared to Hillary's. Privatized nanny state vs "we'll make
it affordable for all but if you don't want it, don't buy it".
I have a challenge for RSPW polliticos: name the only two major party
candidates who lie within the libertarian half of the pyramid.
(libertarian meaning opposite of authoritarian, like con vs lib, not the
L party)
--
Monkeys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Emporer Wonko the Sane
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 6:40 pm Post subject: Re: Observation on Dem Debate |
|
|
Google Beta User wrote in
4631-88ae-cb673c19ff3c@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
> These things are not about the issue or specifics.
>
> It always comes down to perception.
>
> IMO, Obama made Clinton look rather petty and silly at times i.e.
like
> that line when he said apparently all his voters are delusional.
>
> And she comes across as shrill like when she was going on about
> healthcare.
>
> Again, the specifics or who is "right" on those issues is
secondary to
> how they're coming across.
Petty, silly and shrill is not a bad summary of her personality.
Doug
--
"It's called thinking for yourself. I'd look into the idea if I
were you. You seem to have the idea that disagreeing with the
smrat people counts as thinking for yourself." rich hammet |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
"rwa2play
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:03 pm Post subject: Re: Observation on Dem Debate |
|
|
On Feb 22, 7:07 am, "The Calmness of RSPW [was LH]"
wrote:
> In article
> ,
>
>
>
> trijcomm wrote:
> > On Feb 22, 12:36 am, "The Calmness of RSPW [was LH]"
> > wrote:
> > > In article
> > > ,
>
> > > lein wrote:
> > > > On Feb 21, 9:02 pm, Google Beta User wrote:
> > > > > These things are not about the issue or specifics.
>
> > > > > It always comes down to perception.
>
> > > > > IMO, Obama made Clinton look rather petty and silly at times i.e. like
> > > > > that line when he said apparently all his voters are delusional.
>
> > > > > And she comes across as shrill like when she was going on about
> > > > > healthcare.
>
> > > > > Again, the specifics or who is "right" on those issues is secondary to
> > > > > how they're coming across.
>
> > > > Hillary's problem is that she really can't attack Obama on substance
> > > > because Hillary share she same liberal beliefs.
>
> > > And that he doesn't share her authoritarian beliefs.
>
> > > --
> > > Monkeys.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Ha! Oh yes he does! His "let's all come together" garbage means "if
> > you oppose me, you are holding back progress."
>
> He's authoritarian, yes. But not nearly to that same extent nor to
> the same extent as the majority of the other candidates are. Look at his
> healthplan compared to Hillary's. Privatized nanny state vs "we'll make
> it affordable for all but if you don't want it, don't buy it".
>
> I have a challenge for RSPW polliticos: name the only two major party
> candidates who lie within the libertarian half of the pyramid.
> (libertarian meaning opposite of authoritarian, like con vs lib, not the
> L party)
Hillary had plan A to the nomination all worked out but never had a
plan B to deal with a dynamic candidate like Obama. BTW, Obama has
taken a page from the neo-cons and basically said "I won't apologize
for being liberal." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
the Bede
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:22 pm Post subject: Re: Observation on Dem Debate |
|
|
"The Calmness of RSPW [was LH]" wrote in
message @newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com...
> In article
> ,
> lein wrote:
>
>> On Feb 21, 9:02 pm, Google Beta User wrote:
>> > These things are not about the issue or specifics.
>> >
>> > It always comes down to perception.
>> >
>> > IMO, Obama made Clinton look rather petty and silly at times i.e. like
>> > that line when he said apparently all his voters are delusional.
>> >
>> > And she comes across as shrill like when she was going on about
>> > healthcare.
>> >
>> > Again, the specifics or who is "right" on those issues is secondary to
>> > how they're coming across.
>>
>>
>> Hillary's problem is that she really can't attack Obama on substance
>> because Hillary share she same liberal beliefs.
>
>
> And that he doesn't share her authoritarian beliefs.
>
>
"Hillary Clinton: Pear-Shaped Authoritarian".
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Related Topics: | the weather debate..... just heard the lady on the news say san diego and not used to cold weather.... is it just me, or are people bothered by these claims? I mean the players are from all over the country. Its as likely a charger is from minnesota and used to frozen outdoor g
Today on the Herd - RB debate On this morning's Herd on ESPN Radio, Colin Cowherd was arguing that Corey Dillon was the second best running back behind LT. He also guaranteed him to be a lock for the hall if he plays two more seasons. His argument was basically that if it is third a
Anybody wanna debate Manning vs Brady anymore? We here in NE have known what the rest of the country has learned in spades this season!
An Observation about the Colts game. Many of the pundits have been saying "The Colts should have won that game", but after watching the replay, it's obvious they weren't paying attention. The Colts were given 6 pt's on bogus PI calls (They couldn't convert them to TD's) had one totally fluke
Chargers likely to play in London next year Personally I hated this concept even when it didn't involve the Chargers. Losing a home game better not cost the Bolts and it better be against a weak team where we don't need the home field advantage as much... not the Patriots or Colts because I expect |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|