|
| Author |
Message |
Steve
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:06 am Post subject: 2008 schedule |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
user
Joined: 15 Feb 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:04 pm Post subject: Steelers: 2008 schedule |
|
|
Steve wrote:
> The 2008 schedule looks a little tough, with all 10 non-division
> opponents with 8-8 records or better. Should be interesting....
>
> http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/02/17/long/2.html
*Indianapolis (13-4) L
*Jacksonville (12-6)Houston (8- W
*NY Giants (14-6) W
*Washington (9- W
*Dallas (13-4) W
*Philadelphia (8- W
*San Diego (13-6) L
*New England (18-1) L
*Dallas (13-4) W
This is how I see it.
FM... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
user
Joined: 15 Feb 2008
Posts: 13
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: Re: Steelers: 2008 schedule |
|
|
(^c^}Flipper Mike(^c^} wrote:
> Steve wrote:
>
>> The 2008 schedule looks a little tough, with all 10 non-division
>> opponents with 8-8 records or better. Should be interesting....
>>
>> http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/02/17/long/2.html
>>
>
>
> *Indianapolis (13-4) L
> *Jacksonville (12-6)Houston (8- W
> *NY Giants (14-6) W
> *Washington (9- W
> *Dallas (13-4) W
> *Philadelphia (8- W
> *San Diego (13-6) L
> *New England (18-1) L
> *Dallas (13-4) W
> *Houston (8- W
> This is how I see it.
>
> FM...
Sorry I missed Houston*** |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Black & Gold
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:22 am Post subject: Re: Steelers: 2008 schedule |
|
|
(^c^}Flipper Mike(^c^} wrote:
> (^c^}Flipper Mike(^c^} wrote:
>
>> Steve wrote:
>>
>>> The 2008 schedule looks a little tough, with all 10 non-division
>>> opponents with 8-8 records or better. Should be interesting....
>>>
>>> http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/02/17/long/2.html
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Indianapolis (13-4) W
>> *Jacksonville (12-6)Houston (8- W
>> *NY Giants (14-6) W
>> *Washington (9- W
>> *Dallas (13-4) W
>> *Philadelphia (8- W
>> *San Diego (13-6) W
>> *New England (18-1) L
>> *Dallas (13-4) W
>> *Houston (8- W
>
>
>
>> This is how I see it.
Black & Gold |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Duncan
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 6:59 am Post subject: Re: 2008 schedule (2008 Draft morph) |
|
|
"Kel Varnsen" wrote in message
I think upcoming season will be a super one. I think the Steelers get
through all the injuries have a chance to get to the SB. I wonder who
they'll go for in the draft?
Gee, I wonder if the Steelers are trying to tell us something with the poll
question being asked at http://news.steelers.com/
The question is: "What position should the Steelers draft in the first
round?"... all the answers are on defense with not an offensive lineman to
be found. It is listed as poll question part 1, so maybe part 2 will be
offensive position.
I think OL is the biggest concern right now. They weren't all that good last
year; Faneca will be gone and Starks has been given the transition tag but
could still be gone also. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GraveDigger
Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 34
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:34 pm Post subject: Re: 2008 schedule (2008 Draft morph) |
|
|
"Duncan" wrote in message @comcast.com...
>
> "Kel Varnsen" wrote in message
>
> I think upcoming season will be a super one. I think the Steelers get
> through all the injuries have a chance to get to the SB. I wonder who
> they'll go for in the draft?
>
> Gee, I wonder if the Steelers are trying to tell us something with the
> poll question being asked at http://news.steelers.com/
>
> The question is: "What position should the Steelers draft in the first
> round?"... all the answers are on defense with not an offensive lineman to
> be found. It is listed as poll question part 1, so maybe part 2 will be
> offensive position.
> I think OL is the biggest concern right now. They weren't all that good
> last year; Faneca will be gone and Starks has been given the transition
> tag but could still be gone also.
>
Clearly, the offensive line has to be the main area of the 2008 draft for
the Steelers. The 2007 version was pitiful.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
