Another Payroll Chart

Joe · Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 8

Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than a
miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is probably
more accurate than some of the others:

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2

--
Joe

Archived from group: alt>sports>football>pro>buffalo-bills

Geoff · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 12

Joe wrote:
> Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than a
> miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is
> probably more accurate than some of the others:
>
> http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2

You get what you pay for.

Harry · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 21

"Geoff" wrote in message @giganews.com...
> Joe wrote:
>> Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than a
>> miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is
>> probably more accurate than some of the others:
>>
>> http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2
>
> You get what you pay for.
>
and jp is at the 21st spot ? why so low for a top tier QB ?

of the top 10 - how many will make the next opening day line up?

dvaoa · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 2

On Jan 28, 5:19 pm, "Harry" wrote:

> > You get what you pay for.
>
> and jp is at the 21st spot ? why so low for a top tier QB ?

Turn the list upside down.

Harry · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 21

wrote in message @i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 28, 5:19 pm, "Harry" wrote:
>
>> > You get what you pay for.
>>
>> and jp is at the 21st spot ? why so low for a top tier QB ?
>
> Turn the list upside down.

there is some truth to that comment. in some team's cases - it is not about
players 8 through 18 but more about 30 through 40. the replacements for
injuries, veterans hanging around but can fill spots, the young ones moving
up, the special team players that come in and are the ones that fill
important gaps.

so is the upside down list quality ? all teams need replacements every year.

MBD · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 13

> Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than a
> miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is
> probably more accurate than some of the others:
>
> http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2

Matt Bowen and Daimon Shelton weren't even on the team this year. The site
is wrong.

MBD

Tech 811 · Joined: 28 Dec 2007 Posts: 1

they may not have been on the team this year but that doesnt mean that the
bills were not partially responsible for their salaries with other teams
after trading or releasing them. their contracts may not have been up yet
"MBD" wrote in message@207.115.17.102...
> > Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than a
> > miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is
> > probably more accurate than some of the others:
> >
> > http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2
>
> Matt Bowen and Daimon Shelton weren't even on the team this year. The
site
> is wrong.
>
> MBD
>

MBD · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 13

The only thing the Bills would have been on the hook for is unamortized
signing bonus. Bowen received just a $300K signing bonus last year on a 2-
year deal, meaning at most the Bills would have had a $150K cap hit for him
this year.

MBD

> they may not have been on the team this year but that doesnt mean that
> the bills were not partially responsible for their salaries with other
> teams after trading or releasing them. their contracts may not have
> been up yet "MBD" wrote in message
> @207.115.17.102...
>> > Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than
>> > a miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is
>> > probably more accurate than some of the others:
>> >
>> > http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2
>>
>> Matt Bowen and Daimon Shelton weren't even on the team this year.
>> The site is wrong.

Bender · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 19

In article ,
"Joe" wrote:

> Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than a
> miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is probably
> more accurate than some of the others:
>
> http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2

LOL! Better cue up your old reliable "I was wrong" post Joe.
This list was deemed wrong months ago.
Another swing and a miss by our most notable troll.

Bender · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 19

In article , MBD
wrote:

> > Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than a
> > miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is
> > probably more accurate than some of the others:
> >
> > http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2
>
> Matt Bowen and Daimon Shelton weren't even on the team this year. The site
> is wrong.

Yup. The Bills haters and trolls in the group brought this Fox list up
when it first came out. It has been proven back then to be inaccurate.

Joe · Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 8

"Bender" wrote in message @news.giganews.com...
> In article ,
> "Joe" wrote:
>
>> Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than a
>> miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is probably
>> more accurate than some of the others:
>>
>> http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2
>
> LOL! Better cue up your old reliable "I was wrong" post Joe.
> This list was deemed wrong months ago.
> Another swing and a miss by our most notable troll.
>
>

OK Coward..prove me wrong and show the cite for how Fox News is wrong and
you are right.

been able to backup any of his lies>

Joe · Joined: 23 Oct 2007 Posts: 8

"Bender" wrote in message @news.giganews.com...
> In article , MBD
> wrote:
>
>> > Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more than a
>> > miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is
>> > probably more accurate than some of the others:
>> >
>> > http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2
>>
>> Matt Bowen and Daimon Shelton weren't even on the team this year. The
>> site
>> is wrong.
>
>
> Yup. The Bills haters and trolls in the group brought this Fox list up
> when it first came out. It has been proven back then to be inaccurate.

OK Coward.. show the cite for how Fox News is wrong and you are right.

been able to backup any of his lies>

--
Joe

fosterfla · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 89

On Jan 28, 3:58 pm, MBD wrote:

> Matt Bowen and Daimon Shelton weren't even on the team this year. The site
> is wrong.
>
> MBD

Didn't see Trent Edwards on the list either.

mr dude

MBD · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 13

"mr dude@harvarduniversity.edu" wrote in@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> On Jan 28, 3:58 pm, MBD wrote:
>
>> Matt Bowen and Daimon Shelton weren't even on the team this year.
>> The site is wrong.
>>
>> MBD
>
> Didn't see Trent Edwards on the list either.

Bowen and Shelton were two obvious mistakes I saw just from a quick glance.
I'm sure there are several others outside of those and omitting Trent.

MBD

night · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 9

"Joe" wrote in $Sa1.2099
@news02.roc.ny:

> "Bender" wrote in message
> @news.giganews.com...
>> In article , MBD
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > Based on Wilson proving over and over again to be nothing more
than a
>>> > miserly scrooge..this payroll data and team rankings for 2007 is
>>> > probably more accurate than some of the others:
>>> >
>>> > http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/teamSalary?statsId=2
>>>
>>> Matt Bowen and Daimon Shelton weren't even on the team this year.
The
>>> site
>>> is wrong.
>>
>>
>> Yup. The Bills haters and trolls in the group brought this Fox list
up
>> when it first came out. It has been proven back then to be
inaccurate.
>
> OK Coward.. show the cite for how Fox News is wrong and you are right.
>
> once
> been able to backup any of his lies>
>

Bender might ignore it, but I will not.

The team salaries Fox is quoting for 2007 are actually based on the
players 2006 salaries.

Don't believe me?
Look for yourself.
See if you can find Trent Edwards salary.
How about Lynch?
Poz?

Cannot find it? Did they play for free?

Still don't believe it? Pick a player, any player on the Fox site.
Click on the link that will take you to the players individual page.
Look at the salary. It will say 2006.

Here's Chris Kelsay's page:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/player?statsId=6384

"2006 Salary: $502,200"

Kelsay made $500K in 2007? Doubt it. Why? Kelsay just signed a big fat
contract during the off season.

Look at Tripplett's salary on the Fox site. $7 million?
Wow. Talk about paying a player.
Except that $7 million salary was earned in 2006, when he first signed
with the Bills. AND, that figure includes his signing bonus. All $5.5
million of it.

I cannot wait until I see the "2008" salaries from the Fox site. We'll
get to see Dockery's $13 million, Langston Walkers $7 million, and
Kelsay's $7 million salaries. That will really skew the payroll.

That's $27 million tied up on 3 players.

Joe, if you are going to bash Wilson as being "cheap", at least do some
research before you hit send.

Night

Another Article Intimating Pats' Depth Chart at WR It's at it also suggests that Bethel Johnson is not in the top four. In this case, he's listed behind Dwight. Relevant excerpt: > Brown returns to a receiving corps that

Gilbert released

going apeshit over Parcells Who's behind the "Parcells is the best coach ever" propaganda we've been hearning lately? Here's another example: Parcells wasn't even the best coach of the 1980s/early 1990s (Bill Walsh was). Nor w

Falcons players with last name X, Y, Z Can anyone name any Falcons players (active, retired, etc) with the last name starting with X or Y or Z? I looked at the Atlanta Falcons groups at and Thanks Mike

Sherman present @ Henson workout... 20 teams had at least 1 rep there, but Sherman & Mike Mularkey were the only head coaches present. Wyche (Buffalo) summed up the workout & how much one should read into it though... "You don't make any final decisions on these (open workouts), you can onl