yourdomain.com Forum Index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Cornerback Is Packers' #1 Off-Season Need

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Greenbay Packers
Author Message
nerdmann



Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 57

PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:44 pm    Post subject: Cornerback Is Packers' #1 Off-Season Need Reply with quote

http://cheeseheadtv.com/blog/why-cornerback-is-the-packers-1-off-season-need

Cornerback Is Packers' #1 Off-Season Need
packeraaron in Al Harris, Charles Woodson, Off Season Strategy, Packer
Defense, Ted Thompson
They need a guard. And a defensive end. Not to mention a tight end and a
linebacker. But the Green Bay Packers need nothing more than a infusion on
talent at the position of cornerback. Not safety, cornerback.

Take a look at this excellent research compiled by the guys over at
Footballoutsiders. (For an explanation of their methods and mission, and how
their numbers are much more useful than mostly meaningless conventional
statistics, please read here.) They break down not just team defensive
ranking as a whole, but also how each defense fared in 2007 against
different offensive positions. (#1, #2 and 'Other' WRs, TE's RB's, ect.) As
you all know, I'm by no means a stat geek, but I found the positional
breakdown very telling. I've had more than a few small arguments with my
co-host of Packer Translplants regarding the dismal play of our #3 CB over
the course of the year. Corey seemed to echo McCarthy's argument that, when
your #1 and #2 corners are as good as Harris and Woodson, of course the
opposing team is going to go after the #3. And that might well explain SOME
of the following but not all - Only one team in the entire NFL was worse
against #3 and #4 wide recievers than the Green Bay Packers. (The Vikings
were the worst). Now, as I said, some of that is due to the fact that the
Packers #1 and #2 are so good. (Though thank goodness the chart only takes
the regular season into account. Goodness knows how much Green Bay may have
dropped against #1's if they had included Harris' playoff run-in with
Plaxico Burress.) But a lot of it has to do with some pretty poor play from
both Jarrett Bush (who I think is sub-standard at best) and Tramon Williams
(who I think gives great effort but just doesn't have the tools necessary to
be a good cover guy).

With both Harris and Woodson getting up in years, and nothing in reserve
behind them, it would seem obvious that Thompson needs to be proactive both
in the draft and in free agency to stockpile more talent in the defensive
backfield. Perhaps Will Blackmon could provide some help, but until he
proves he can stay healthy for more than the opening kickoff, the team
simply can't count on any realistic contribution there.

Archived from group: alt>sports>football>pro>gb-packers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Late Season Packers... ....aren't impressing me, to say the least. But to be perfectly fair, they have been impressive this season, without a doubt! Who actually believed they'd win 12 or 13 games this year? I know one person who believed that, but he believes that every year,

43% say Packers should be #2

Packers in Milwaukee I'm a long time Packers fan and live in Alaska and was just wondering what season/year did the Pack stop playing half of their home games in Milwaukee. Never could understand why they played any games in Milwaukee other than the fact the Pack is the only

Packers after Volek This is one of the guys I'd hoped they would pursue. He's showed enough as a backup that he intrigues lots of teams, but he isn't going to cost Drew Henson-like contract or JP Losman-level draft pick (Tennessee is tight against the cap and probably can't

Packers sign former Be*r Looks like all the talent keeps flowing in one direction. Line candidate The Chicago Bears have given the agent for defensive end Phillip Daniels permission to shop his client, and the Packers expressed
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Greenbay Packers All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group