yourdomain.com Forum Index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Jason Garrett staying put

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Dallas Cowboys
Author Message
Tony Nichols



Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:39 pm    Post subject: Jason Garrett staying put Reply with quote

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3200822

This is good news for the offense and further development
of Romo.

Archived from group: alt>sports>football>pro>dallas-cowboys
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JC



Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:04 pm    Post subject: Re: Jason Garrett staying put Reply with quote

"Tony Nichols" wrote in message $0$6487$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3200822
>
> This is good news for the offense and further development
> of Romo.
>
>
>
The kid's got a brain in his head.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zcarenow



Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:33 am    Post subject: Re: Jason Garrett staying put Reply with quote

On Jan 17, 10:04 am, "JC" wrote:
> "Tony Nichols" wrote in message
>
> $0$6487$email_removedhttp://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3200822
>
> > This is good news for the offense and further development
> > of Romo.
>
> The kid's got a brain in his head.

The kid's gonna make more money next year than he ever did during his
playing career. Amazing!...though he shoulda used his brain more last
week against the Giants in the 2nd half.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JC



Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Jason Garrett staying put Reply with quote

wrote in message @i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 17, 10:04 am, "JC" wrote:
>> "Tony Nichols" wrote in message
>>
>> $0$6487$email_removedhttp://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3200822
>>
>> > This is good news for the offense and further development
>> > of Romo.
>>
>> The kid's got a brain in his head.
>
> The kid's gonna make more money next year than he ever did during his
> playing career. Amazing!...though he shoulda used his brain more last
> week against the Giants in the 2nd half.

He can't catch the passes, block the defense or run the ball and that's what
cost the Cowboys the game. That game had nothing at all to do with the
coaching. The team just quit and I think it was more from some kind of
internal tension between some of the players.


--
The doctors have narrowed my condition
down to two ailments. They say I either
have arthritis or rigor mortis.

JC

www.cellphonesforsoldiers.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zcarenow



Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 12

PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 1:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Jason Garrett staying put Reply with quote

On Jan 18, 7:34 am, "JC" wrote:
> wrote in message
>
> @i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jan 17, 10:04 am, "JC" wrote:
> >> "Tony Nichols" wrote in message
>
> >>$0$6487$email_removedhttp://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3200822
>
> >> > This is good news for the offense and further development
> >> > of Romo.
>
> >> The kid's got a brain in his head.
>
> > The kid's gonna make more money next year than he ever did during his
> > playing career. Amazing!...though he shoulda used his brain more last
> > week against the Giants in the 2nd half.
>
> He can't catch the passes, block the defense or run the ball and that's what
> cost the Cowboys the game. That game had nothing at all to do with the
> coaching. The team just quit and I think it was more from some kind of
> internal tension between some of the players.
>
> --
> The doctors have narrowed my condition
> down to two ailments. They say I either
> have arthritis or rigor mortis.
>
> JC
>
> www.cellphonesforsoldiers.com

Yeah, true, but they were also outcoached in 2nd half. Shoulda stuck
to the running game more. Shoulda recognized the blitzes that were
coming more often.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rodney Parker



Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Jason Garrett staying put Reply with quote

On Jan 18, 10:56 am, "zcare...@yahoo.com" wrote:
> On Jan 18, 7:34 am, "JC" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote in message
>
> >@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > On Jan 17, 10:04 am, "JC" wrote:
> > >> "Tony Nichols" wrote in message
>
> > >>$0$6487$email_removedhttp://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3200822
>
> > >> > This is good news for the offense and further development
> > >> > of Romo.
>
> > >> The kid's got a brain in his head.
>
> > > The kid's gonna make more money next year than he ever did during his
> > > playing career. Amazing!...though he shoulda used his brain more last
> > > week against the Giants in the 2nd half.
>
> > He can't catch the passes, block the defense or run the ball and that's what
> > cost the Cowboys the game. That game had nothing at all to do with the
> > coaching. The team just quit and I think it was more from some kind of
> > internal tension between some of the players.
>
> > --
> > The doctors have narrowed my condition
> > down to two ailments. They say I either
> > have arthritis or rigor mortis.
>
> > JC
>
> >www.cellphonesforsoldiers.com
>
> Yeah, true, but they were also outcoached in 2nd half. Shoulda stuck
> to the running game more.

Barber still carried the ball 11 times in the second half. The reason
he didn't run more was because he was gassed, and it wasn't working
anyway.

Shoulda recognized the blitzes that were
> coming more often.

Dallas was keeping 6-7 men in to block. They didn't have to recognize
it because they already knew it was coming. When the Giants realized
that Owens and Glenn couldn't hurt them deep, the brought 9 men up to
the line. The jammed the receivers with three, and rushed the other
six, which stifled the running game and disrupted the passing game by
not allowing (a) receivers to get into their routes, and (B) Romo
enough time to wait for the routes to develop.

Without speed to stretch the defense, the Giants were allowed to play
the entire second half with that approach. It wasn't that Dallas was
outcoached (at least, not to the extent some people claim), it's that
there wasn't a solution available. When you have to rely on Miles
Austin to stretch the defense, you have a problem.

Rod
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Preacher



Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 2:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Jason Garrett staying put Reply with quote

Rodney Parker wrote:

> Barber still carried the ball 11 times in the second half. The reason
> he didn't run more was because he was gassed, and it wasn't working
> anyway.

That, and iirc, the Giants had a lot of guys up front to stop him.

> Dallas was keeping 6-7 men in to block. They didn't have to recognize
> it because they already knew it was coming. When the Giants realized
> that Owens and Glenn couldn't hurt them deep, the brought 9 men up to
> the line. The jammed the receivers with three, and rushed the other
> six, which stifled the running game and disrupted the passing game by
> not allowing (a) receivers to get into their routes, and (B) Romo
> enough time to wait for the routes to develop.
>
> Without speed to stretch the defense, the Giants were allowed to play
> the entire second half with that approach. It wasn't that Dallas was
> outcoached (at least, not to the extent some people claim), it's that
> there wasn't a solution available. When you have to rely on Miles
> Austin to stretch the defense, you have a problem.

Truly. But is there no other solution? If not, I guess we just ran out
of depth.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RogerM



Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:46 am    Post subject: Re: Jason Garrett staying put Reply with quote

JC wrote:
>
> He can't catch the passes, block the defense or run the ball and that's what
> cost the Cowboys the game. That game had nothing at all to do with the
> coaching. The team just quit and I think it was more from some kind of
> internal tension between some of the players.
>

Players don't throw away a chance to go to the superbowl because they
have a beef. The Cowboys lost because they were unable to deal with the
pass rush in the second half. THAT'S about coaching.

--

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Jason Garrett interview I just watched the interview. So Jason is essentially offered a head coaching job by two He says he wants to be a head coach. Jerry is pursuing him like there's no tomorrow. They have a private meeting late Wednesday night. Jerry pursu

Garrett next Falcons coach? January 16, 2008 ATLANTA (AP) -- One day after introducing their new general manager, the Atlanta Falcons got back to work trying to find a head coach Wednesday, meeting with Dallas Cowboys offensive coordinator Jason Garrett for the second time. Thomas D

Ravens close to hiring Garrett Sources: Garrett brought in for 2nd interview Cowboys offensive coordinator could be offered job before he leaves town Jamison Hensley Sun reporter 10:33 PM EST, January 14, 2008 Dallas Cowboys offensive coordinator Jason Garrett took a m

Jason Taylor The 26-foot high replica of Miami Dolphins star player Jason Taylor to mark the game. The formidable animatronic, the biggest animated human figure ever built, is a 'world first'. If you want to go and see 'Big JT' in action in London, you can find him al

Jason Wright Use him if you've got him, Lewis is OUT. Should have a great day.
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Dallas Cowboys All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group