Lentz/Sydney Diego - Pot/Kettle

Gregg Luze · Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 13

If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we are different people.) I had noticed that both Greg Putz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. So,
I wrote a little program to look at Putz's and Sydney's postings. You may find it interesting to look at the header information, which because of non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Putz's posts and Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
Infamy." Why do Putz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address???? This might explain why Putz is so suspicious of finding everyone else doing that which he does. Putz, not all of us are quite so lame as you.

G

Archived from group: alt>sports>football>pro>sf-49ers

Greg Lentz · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 20

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze wrote:

>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not
>smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we
>are different people.)

Oh, people are definitely fascinated by the topic.

>I had noticed that both Greg Lentz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the
>same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. So, I wrote a
>little program to look at Lentz's and Sydney's postings. You may find it
>interesting to look at the header information, which because of
>non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Lentz's posts and
>Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
>Infamy."

Post the information. I'm sure we would all find it very interesting and
educational.

>Why do Lentz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address????

Well, post your findings detective. Then we'll attempt to dig into the
mystery.

>This might explain why Lentz is so suspicious of finding everyone else
>doing that which he does.

I'm not suspicious of anything. I just post on what "is."
--
Greg Lentz

Sydney Diego · Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 16

On Feb 12, 3:31 pm, Greg Lentz wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze wrote:
> >If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not
> >smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we
> >are different people.)
>
> Oh, people are definitely fascinated by the topic.
>
> >I had noticed that both Greg Lentz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the
> >same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. So, I wrote a
> >little program to look at Lentz's and Sydney's postings. You may find it
> >interesting to look at the header information, which because of
> >non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Lentz's posts and
> >Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
> >Infamy."
>
> Post the information. I'm sure we would all find it very interesting and
> educational.
>
> >Why do Lentz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address????
>
> Well, post your findings detective. Then we'll attempt to dig into the
> mystery.
>
> >This might explain why Lentz is so suspicious of finding everyone else
> >doing that which he does.
>
> I'm not suspicious of anything. I just post on what "is."
> --

I'm having a Frod flashback...........

JW · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 20

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze
wrote:

>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we are different people.) I had noticed that both Greg Putz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. So,
>I wrote a little program to look at Putz's and Sydney's postings. You may find it interesting to look at the header information, which because of non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Putz's posts and Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
>Infamy." Why do Putz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address???? This might explain why Putz is so suspicious of finding everyone else doing that which he does. Putz, not all of us are quite so lame as you.
>
>G

Since you're the one driven to continue posting on the subject of
Lentz and Sydney, as yourself that question and see what answer you
get.

God · Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 6

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:50:26 -0800 (PST), Sydney Diego wrote:

>On Feb 12, 3:31 pm, Greg Lentz wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze wrote:
>> >If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not
>> >smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we
>> >are different people.)
>>
>> Oh, people are definitely fascinated by the topic.
>>
>> >I had noticed that both Greg Lentz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the
>> >same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. So, I wrote a
>> >little program to look at Lentz's and Sydney's postings. You may find it
>> >interesting to look at the header information, which because of
>> >non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Lentz's posts and
>> >Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
>> >Infamy."
>>
>> Post the information. I'm sure we would all find it very interesting and
>> educational.
>>
>> >Why do Lentz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address????
>>
>> Well, post your findings detective. Then we'll attempt to dig into the
>> mystery.
>>
>> >This might explain why Lentz is so suspicious of finding everyone else
>> >doing that which he does.
>>
>> I'm not suspicious of anything. I just post on what "is."
>> --
>
>I'm having a Frod flashback...........
>

I've had acid flashbacks. I've had alcohol related flashbacks. I've had wake-up-the-morning-after-and-see-who-I-slept-with-the-night-before flashbacks. When did you have Frod in your mouth and why, for GOD's sake, did you swallow?

GOD

Gregg Luze · Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 13

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:31:43 -0800, Greg Lentz wrote:

>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze wrote:
>
>>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not
>>smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we
>>are different people.)
>
>Oh, people are definitely fascinated by the topic.
>

You're not real experienced or smart, are you? That was asked rhetorically. Just how many identities are you posting now?

>>I had noticed that both Greg Lentz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the
>>same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. So, I wrote a
>>little program to look at Lentz's and Sydney's postings. You may find it
>>interesting to look at the header information, which because of
>>non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Lentz's posts and
>>Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
>>Infamy."
>
>Post the information. I'm sure we would all find it very interesting and
>educational.

You wouldn't understand it, spuds.

>
>>Why do Lentz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address????
>
>Well, post your findings detective. Then we'll attempt to dig into the
>mystery.

What's the matter, can you not find it yourself?

>>This might explain why Lentz is so suspicious of finding everyone else
>>doing that which he does.
>
>I'm not suspicious of anything. I just post on what "is."

Only to the degree that a negative shows a picture of what "is." LMAO

G

Gregg Luze · Joined: 13 Feb 2008 Posts: 2

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:09:20 -1000, JW wrote:

>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze
>wrote:
>
>>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we are different people.) I had noticed that both Greg Putz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. So,
>>I wrote a little program to look at Putz's and Sydney's postings. You may find it interesting to look at the header information, which because of non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Putz's posts and Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
>>Infamy." Why do Putz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address???? This might explain why Putz is so suspicious of finding everyone else doing that which he does. Putz, not all of us are quite so lame as you.
>>
>>G
>
>Since you're the one driven to continue posting on the subject of
>Lentz and Sydney, as yourself that question and see what answer you
>get.

I have posted 3-4 messages on the subject (I think.) Lentz's several different names keep posting on the subject amid
waves of textual diarrhea from Stink.

BTW, on several days Lentz's and Sydney's IP address are the same and their Path: is exactly the same. I wonder why
that is and what other people share that one small brain.

G

PS - I have a new Usenet access supplier.

Gregg Luze · Joined: 13 Feb 2008 Posts: 2

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:31:43 -0800, Greg Lentz wrote:

>On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze wrote:
>
>>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not
>>smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we
>>are different people.)
>
>Oh, people are definitely fascinated by the topic.
>
>>I had noticed that both Greg Lentz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the
>>same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. So, I wrote a
>>little program to look at Lentz's and Sydney's postings. You may find it
>>interesting to look at the header information, which because of
>>non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Lentz's posts and
>>Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
>>Infamy."
>
>Post the information. I'm sure we would all find it very interesting and
>educational.
>
>>Why do Lentz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address????
>
>Well, post your findings detective. Then we'll attempt to dig into the
>mystery.
>
>>This might explain why Lentz is so suspicious of finding everyone else
>>doing that which he does.
>
>I'm not suspicious of anything. I just post on what "is."

I gave enough specific information for anyone that is interested. Apparently, no one is interested enough that they
looked up the information. I am not going to post it because of two reasons. First is that you should do your own scut
work (if you are able), and second is that you have a habit of changing other's posts so that they make your arguments
look plausible. If people look it up for themselves then you cannot make your typical claim that the data was changed.
We have all seen you do that and I am not falling for it.

Your so called proof was based upon two people using the same Usenet service while my proof was two people using the
same IP address. Anyone who knows anything about Internet traffic knows that IP addresses are unique while tens of
thousands of users use giganews supplied by Forte.

You just post what is? When did that start?

I notice that you were able to see my post. Did you lie about placing me in your killfile or did you decide to change
that, you Putz? Was that after you told us that no defensive ends weighed 300 pounds or more? Perhaps it was after you
told us how good the offensive line was going to be this past season? How about after you told us how Fields was going
to be playing NT and not DE? And the list goes on and on about how you told it like it is not.

G

Sydney Diego · Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 16

On Feb 13, 7:03 am, Gregg Luze wrote:

> Your so called proof was based upon two people using the same Usenet service while my proof was two people using the
> same IP address.

The major flaw in your argument is that the same ip address WASN'T
used !

skepticl1 · Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 11

On 13 Feb, 06:47, Gregg Luze wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:09:20 -1000, JW wrote:
> >On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze
> >wrote:
>
> >>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we are different people.) ï¿½I had noticed that both Greg Putz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. ï¿½So,
> >>I wrote a little program to look at Putz's and Sydney's postings. ï¿½You may find it interesting to look at the header information, which because of non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Putz's posts and Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
> >>Infamy." ï¿½Why do Putz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address???? ï¿½This might explain why Putz is so suspicious of finding everyone else doing that which he does. ï¿½Putz, not all of us are quite so lame as you.
>
> >>G
>
> >Since you're the one driven to continue posting on the subject of
> >Lentz and Sydney, as yourself that question and see what answer you
> >get.
>
> I have posted 3-4 messages on the subject (I think.) ï¿½Lentz's several different names keep posting on the subject amid
> waves of textual diarrhea from Stink.
>
> BTW, on several days Lentz's and Sydney's IP address are the same and their Path: is exactly the same. ï¿½I wonder why
> that is and what other people share that one small brain.
>
> G
>
> PS - I have a new Usenet access supplier.

To think Greg Lentz, a man of his age,--with the pot belly and the
forest of hair on his back posting under multiple names, with kid
titles like 'I can smell your brain' and 'stink'--That's something
adolescent children as they develop acne and their voices break.

Sydney Diego · Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 16

On Feb 13, 11:37Â am, skepticl1 wrote:
> On 13 Feb, 06:47, Gregg Luze wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:09:20 -1000, JW wrote:
> > >On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze
> > >wrote:
>
> > >>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we are different people.) ï¿½I had noticed that both Greg Putz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. ï¿½So,
> > >>I wrote a little program to look at Putz's and Sydney's postings. ï¿½You may find it interesting to look at the header information, which because of non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Putz's posts and Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
> > >>Infamy." ï¿½Why do Putz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address???? ï¿½This might explain why Putz is so suspicious of finding everyone else doing that which he does. ï¿½Putz, not all of us are quite so lame as you.
>
> > >>G
>
> > >Since you're the one driven to continue posting on the subject of
> > >Lentz and Sydney, as yourself that question and see what answer you
> > >get.
>
> > I have posted 3-4 messages on the subject (I think.) ï¿½Lentz's several different names keep posting on the subject amid
> > waves of textual diarrhea from Stink.
>
> > BTW, on several days Lentz's and Sydney's IP address are the same and their Path: is exactly the same. ï¿½I wonder why
> > that is and what other people share that one small brain.
>
> > G
>
> > PS - I have a new Usenet access supplier.
>
> To think Greg Lentz, a man of his age,--with the pot belly and the
> forest of hair on his back posting under multiple names, with kid
> titles like 'I can smell your brain' and 'stink'--That's something
> adolescent children as they develop acne and their voices break.- Hide quoted text -
>

He's not the one posting under multiple userids............

Not too tough to figure out who is.

Gregg Luze · Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 13

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:32:51 -0800 (PST), Sydney Diego wrote:

>On Feb 13, 11:37 am, skepticl1 wrote:
>> On 13 Feb, 06:47, Gregg Luze wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:09:20 -1000, JW wrote:
>> > >On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze
>> > >wrote:
>>
>> > >>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we are different people.) ?I had noticed that both Greg Putz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. ?So,
>> > >>I wrote a little program to look at Putz's and Sydney's postings. ?You may find it interesting to look at the header information, which because of non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Putz's posts and Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
>> > >>Infamy." ?Why do Putz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address???? ?This might explain why Putz is so suspicious of finding everyone else doing that which he does. ?Putz, not all of us are quite so lame as you.
>>
>> > >>G
>>
>> > >Since you're the one driven to continue posting on the subject of
>> > >Lentz and Sydney, as yourself that question and see what answer you
>> > >get.
>>
>> > I have posted 3-4 messages on the subject (I think.) ?Lentz's several different names keep posting on the subject amid
>> > waves of textual diarrhea from Stink.
>>
>> > BTW, on several days Lentz's and Sydney's IP address are the same and their Path: is exactly the same. ?I wonder why
>> > that is and what other people share that one small brain.
>>
>> > G
>>
>> > PS - I have a new Usenet access supplier.
>>
>> To think Greg Lentz, a man of his age,--with the pot belly and the
>> forest of hair on his back posting under multiple names, with kid
>> titles like 'I can smell your brain' and 'stink'--That's something
>> adolescent children as they develop acne and their voices break.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>
>He's not the one posting under multiple userids............
>
>Not too tough to figure out who is.
>
>
That is the first thing that you have posted that is correct, Greg. You really should get that computer of yours fixed. NNTP should not log the IP address but it does when your software is corrupted and transmitting non-compliant header information.

Sydney Diego · Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 16

On Feb 13, 3:09 pm, Gregg Luze wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:32:51 -0800 (PST), Sydney Diego wrote:
> >On Feb 13, 11:37 am, skepticl1 wrote:
> >> On 13 Feb, 06:47, Gregg Luze wrote:
>
> >> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:09:20 -1000, JW wrote:
> >> > >On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze
> >> > >wrote:
>
> >> > >>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we are different people.) ?I had noticed that both Greg Putz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. ?So,
> >> > >>I wrote a little program to look at Putz's and Sydney's postings. ?You may find it interesting to look at the header information, which because of non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Putz's posts and Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
> >> > >>Infamy." ?Why do Putz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address???? ?This might explain why Putz is so suspicious of finding everyone else doing that which he does. ?Putz, not all of us are quite so lame as you..
>
> >> > >>G
>
> >> > >Since you're the one driven to continue posting on the subject of
> >> > >Lentz and Sydney, as yourself that question and see what answer you
> >> > >get.
>
> >> > I have posted 3-4 messages on the subject (I think.) ?Lentz's several different names keep posting on the subject amid
> >> > waves of textual diarrhea from Stink.
>
> >> > BTW, on several days Lentz's and Sydney's IP address are the same and their Path: is exactly the same. ?I wonder why
> >> > that is and what other people share that one small brain.
>
> >> > G
>
> >> > PS - I have a new Usenet access supplier.
>
> >> To think Greg Lentz, a man of his age,--with the pot belly and the
> >> forest of hair on his back posting under multiple names, with kid
> >> titles like 'I can smell your brain' and 'stink'--That's something
> >> adolescent children as they develop acne and their voices break.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >He's not the one posting under multiple userids............
>
> >Not too tough to figure out who is.
>
>You really should get that computer of yours fixed.

Which one ?

God · Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 6

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:08:48 -0800 (PST), Sydney Diego wrote:

>On Feb 13, 3:09 pm, Gregg Luze wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:32:51 -0800 (PST), Sydney Diego wrote:
>> >On Feb 13, 11:37 am, skepticl1 wrote:
>> >> On 13 Feb, 06:47, Gregg Luze wrote:
>>
>> >> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:09:20 -1000, JW wrote:
>> >> > >On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:12:55 -0800, Gregg Luze
>> >> > >wrote:
>>
>> >> > >>If anyone is really interested, I wondered why it was that Lentz was not smart enough to let this whole thing about myself and Stink go (and we are different people.) ?I had noticed that both Greg Putz and Sydney Diego had posted upon the same subjects and with similar themes to their messages. ?So,
>> >> > >>I wrote a little program to look at Putz's and Sydney's postings. ?You may find it interesting to look at the header information, which because of non-compliant formatting included IP addresses, of Greg Putz's posts and Sydney Diego's posts on 1/2/08 and the subject of "A day the will live in
>> >> > >>Infamy." ?Why do Putz's and Sydney's posts both have the same IP address???? ?This might explain why Putz is so suspicious of finding everyone else doing that which he does. ?Putz, not all of us are quite so lame as you.
>>
>> >> > >>G
>>
>> >> > >Since you're the one driven to continue posting on the subject of
>> >> > >Lentz and Sydney, as yourself that question and see what answer you
>> >> > >get.
>>
>> >> > I have posted 3-4 messages on the subject (I think.) ?Lentz's several different names keep posting on the subject amid
>> >> > waves of textual diarrhea from Stink.
>>
>> >> > BTW, on several days Lentz's and Sydney's IP address are the same and their Path: is exactly the same. ?I wonder why
>> >> > that is and what other people share that one small brain.
>>
>> >> > G
>>
>> >> > PS - I have a new Usenet access supplier.
>>
>> >> To think Greg Lentz, a man of his age,--with the pot belly and the
>> >> forest of hair on his back posting under multiple names, with kid
>> >> titles like 'I can smell your brain' and 'stink'--That's something
>> >> adolescent children as they develop acne and their voices break.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >He's not the one posting under multiple userids............
>>
>> >Not too tough to figure out who is.
>>
>>You really should get that computer of yours fixed.
>
>Which one ?
>
>
Whichever one you are using for your posts, Sybil.

GOD

Gregg Luze · Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 13

On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:19:47 -0800 (PST), Sydney Diego wrote:

>On Feb 13, 7:03 am, Gregg Luze wrote:
>
>> Your so called proof was based upon two people using the same Usenet service while my proof was two people using the
>> same IP address.
>
>The major flaw in your argument is that the same ip address WASN'T
>used !
>
>
Greg, you can make the false claims, as you usually do, but the facts are there for anyone to observe.

G

Steelers win in San Diego! This is a good team! Forget the last two Patriots games - their time will come. Meanwhile enjoy this Steeler team! They are a REAL team and played a team effort to win tonight in San Diego! CF-

Why didn't Daddy Manning want Eli to play in San Diego. Did Daddy Manning even know where San Diego was located? Beautiful weather most of the year. Much better for QB stats than playing in windy Giants stadium. Also cold is not usually a QB's friend. Beautiful women. West coast women and southern women leave

Norv Turner will ruin the San Diego Chargers "4. Norv Turner will ruin the San Diego Chargers: For the record, I think Turner is a likable guy. I just never thought he was much of a head coach and I had ample evidence on my side (the man's career record in the NFL was 58-82-1 entering this season).

Indy: Colts to face a recharged San Diego [RM: I'll post a few stories this week from the Indianapolis Star.] January 7, 2008 Colts to face a recharged San Diego Chargers will arrive at RCA Dome with a 7-game winning streak Seven weeks ago, the San Diego Chargers were amidst a crisis of confidenc

Cowboys interested in San Diego RB Michael Turner? --- March 31, 2007 --- Excerpts: The Chargers are dealing with four suitors for backup running back Michael Turner, sources said, and Turner's agent has spoken with at least one