 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
btpage0630
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:22 pm Post subject: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
Musical acts that have lasted, gotten grammy noms etc. But the
question is, did they start off relevant and cowtow to the industry,
or did they get better with age? Discuss the following:
Foo Fighters: Monkey Wrench----The Pretender
Red Hot Chili Peppers: Sock on the jock---Played on all the HotAC
stations
Beastie Boys: Banned from Lincoln, NE---Veteran artists with cred
Green Day: Naked on stage and high as a kite---Political commentary
of American Idiot
Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
All of the above had pretty meager beginnings, made it huge, and then
seemed to become a staple over time.
Brent
Archived from group: rec>sport>football>college |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peach
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:11 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Feb 20, 8:22 am, btpage0...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Musical acts that have lasted, gotten grammy noms etc. But the
> question is, did they start off relevant and cowtow to the industry,
> or did they get better with age? Discuss the following:
>
> Foo Fighters: Monkey Wrench----The Pretender
I still think they kick ass, but hey, that's just me.
> Red Hot Chili Peppers: Sock on the jock---Played on all the HotAC
> stations
They have definitely pussified over the years. Heck, my 46-year-old
sister likes them and didn't during their tube sock days.
> Beastie Boys: Banned from Lincoln, NE---Veteran artists with cred
Only slightly relevant.
> Green Day: Naked on stage and high as a kite---Political commentary
> of American Idiot
They've just morphed with the times, but I don't see them as selling
out too much.
> Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
Does it matter?
Peach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jaybyrd
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:23 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Feb 20, 10:22 am, btpage0...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Musical acts that have lasted, gotten grammy noms etc. But the
> question is, did they start off relevant and cowtow to the industry,
> or did they get better with age? Discuss the following:
>
> Foo Fighters: Monkey Wrench----The Pretender
> Red Hot Chili Peppers: Sock on the jock---Played on all the HotAC
> stations
> Beastie Boys: Banned from Lincoln, NE---Veteran artists with cred
> Green Day: Naked on stage and high as a kite---Political commentary
> of American Idiot
> Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
>
> All of the above had pretty meager beginnings, made it huge, and then
> seemed to become a staple over time.
>
> Brent
out of this list I still love the beastie boys the most. all the
others i can take or leave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
btpage0630
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:40 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Feb 20, 11:11 am, Peach wrote:
> On Feb 20, 8:22 am, btpage0...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > Musical acts that have lasted, gotten grammy noms etc. But the
> > question is, did they start off relevant and cowtow to the industry,
> > or did they get better with age? Discuss the following:
>
> > Foo Fighters: Monkey Wrench----The Pretender
>
> I still think they kick ass, but hey, that's just me.
I do too, but there is no question they are trying to create "epic"
songs right now. Starting with Times Like These and The Best of Me.
> > Red Hot Chili Peppers: Sock on the jock---Played on all the HotAC
> > stations
>
> They have definitely pussified over the years. Heck, my 46-year-old
> sister likes them and didn't during their tube sock days.
I was only okay with them back then. I think they've really toned it
down, but at the same time managed to remain pretty musical. I think
my favorite album is Californication which is after they toned it
down.
> > Beastie Boys: Banned from Lincoln, NE---Veteran artists with cred
>
> Only slightly relevant.
seems like they are getting a lot of nods from current artists, but
maybe that's just my preception.
>
> > Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
>
> Does it matter?
>
I put him in there for fun. What started off as just fun for him
turned into a franchise, and yet, it's still fun for him. Go figure.
Brent |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peach
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:48 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Feb 20, 9:40 am, btpage0...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Feb 20, 11:11 am, Peach wrote:
>
> > On Feb 20, 8:22 am, btpage0...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > Musical acts that have lasted, gotten grammy noms etc. But the
> > > question is, did they start off relevant and cowtow to the industry,
> > > or did they get better with age? Discuss the following:
>
> > > Foo Fighters: Monkey Wrench----The Pretender
>
> > I still think they kick ass, but hey, that's just me.
>
> I do too, but there is no question they are trying to create "epic"
> songs right now. Starting with Times Like These and The Best of Me.
DOA, though.... that song is still, by far, my favorite. The drums are
too amazing...just the whole composition of the song. (I can't explain
it really.)
>
> > > Beastie Boys: Banned from Lincoln, NE---Veteran artists with cred
>
> > Only slightly relevant.
>
> seems like they are getting a lot of nods from current artists, but
> maybe that's just my preception.
Yea, but are they getting nods for their present work or their past
work?
Peach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ben Stewart
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:25 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
"Peach" wrote in message@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 20, 8:22 am, btpage0...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Musical acts that have lasted, gotten grammy noms etc. But the
> question is, did they start off relevant and cowtow to the industry,
> or did they get better with age? Discuss the following:
>
> Foo Fighters: Monkey Wrench----The Pretender
>>> I still think they kick ass, but hey, that's just me.
IAWTP.
I love the Foo. I think they are the best ppure rock band out there right
now. Their live shows are awesome.
> Red Hot Chili Peppers: Sock on the jock---Played on all the HotAC
> stations
>>> They have definitely pussified over the years. Heck, my 46-year-old
>>> sister likes them and didn't during their tube sock days.
IAWTP.
>>> Peach |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David V. Loewe, Jr
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:17 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:11:02 -0800 (PST), Peach
wrote:
>On Feb 20, 8:22 am, btpage0...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> Musical acts that have lasted, gotten grammy noms etc. But the
>> question is, did they start off relevant and cowtow to the industry,
>> or did they get better with age? Discuss the following:
>>
>> Foo Fighters: Monkey Wrench----The Pretender
>
>I still think they kick ass, but hey, that's just me.
>
>> Red Hot Chili Peppers: Sock on the jock---Played on all the HotAC
>> stations
>
>They have definitely pussified over the years. Heck, my 46-year-old
>sister likes them and didn't during their tube sock days.
>
>> Beastie Boys: Banned from Lincoln, NE---Veteran artists with cred
>
>Only slightly relevant.
>
>> Green Day: Naked on stage and high as a kite---Political commentary
>> of American Idiot
>
>They've just morphed with the times, but I don't see them as selling
>out too much.
>
>> Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
>
>Does it matter?
I feel *old*.
--
"If I told you, I'd have to kill you first..."
Legendary Retort of Sailors To Requests For
'Sensitive' Information |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
E.F. Hokie
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:39 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:17:00 -0600, David V. Loewe, Jr wrote...
> >> Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
> >
> >Does it matter?
>
> I feel *old*.
You've only got two options, David.
Getting older is the better of the two.
--
E.F. Hokie
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David V. Loewe, Jr
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:25 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:39:07 -0500, E.F. Hokie wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:17:00 -0600, David V. Loewe, Jr wrote...
>
>> >> Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
>> >
>> >Does it matter?
>>
>> I feel *old*.
>
>You've only got two options, David.
>
>Getting older is the better of the two.
Who are you? And, have you been around here lately?
I ask because of "recent" (starting in August) posts I have made about
my physical condition. I need to know how much I have to fill you in
on. There are three options - dying (your unspoken one), getting ill
and (just) getting older. My 68 year old father is, in most ways,
better off physically than I am because I'm sick and he's not.
I feel *old* because I could not identify anything that the Foo
Fighters have done. RHCP would be problematic. Beastie Boys, just
the really old stuff. Green Day, not so much (probably just Good
Riddance). Weird Al, just the pre-1990 stuff (at one point I had
every Weird Al album). I thought I'd be hip forever, but (new) music
has passed me by.
--
"Clams on the half shell...and rollerskates."
Bernard Edwards & Nile Rodgers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
btpage0630
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:26 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Feb 20, 3:25 pm, "David V. Loewe, Jr"
wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:39:07 -0500, E.F. Hokie wrote:
> >On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:17:00 -0600, David V. Loewe, Jr wrote...
>
> >> >> Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
>
> >> >Does it matter?
>
> >> I feel *old*.
>
> >You've only got two options, David.
>
> >Getting older is the better of the two.
>
> Who are you? And, have you been around here lately?
>
> I ask because of "recent" (starting in August) posts I have made about
> my physical condition. I need to know how much I have to fill you in
> on. There are three options - dying (your unspoken one), getting ill
> and (just) getting older. My 68 year old father is, in most ways,
> better off physically than I am because I'm sick and he's not.
>
Dude. MOST people don't read every post. I've had several back and
forths with you and I have no idea what you are talking about.
Brent |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
E.F. Hokie
Joined: 20 Feb 2008 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:43 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:25:21 -0600, David V. Loewe, Jr wrote...
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:39:07 -0500, E.F. Hokie wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:17:00 -0600, David V. Loewe, Jr wrote...
> >
> >> >> Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
> >> >
> >> >Does it matter?
> >>
> >> I feel *old*.
> >
> >You've only got two options, David.
> >
> >Getting older is the better of the two.
>
> Who are you? And, have you been around here lately?
I'm aware of your condition. Getting older while being ill is still
getting older. It's a binary system: you either conntinue to age or you
do not continue to age. What happens during either option is secondary.
How is your recovery going? I wish you well with that.
--
E.F. Hokie
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David V. Loewe, Jr
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:21 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:43:23 -0500, E.F. Hokie wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:25:21 -0600, David V. Loewe, Jr wrote...
>
>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:39:07 -0500, E.F. Hokie wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:17:00 -0600, David V. Loewe, Jr wrote...
>> >
>> >> >> Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
>> >> >
>> >> >Does it matter?
>> >>
>> >> I feel *old*.
>> >
>> >You've only got two options, David.
>> >
>> >Getting older is the better of the two.
>>
>> Who are you? And, have you been around here lately?
>
>I'm aware of your condition. Getting older while being ill is still
>getting older. It's a binary system: you either conntinue to age or you
>do not continue to age. What happens during either option is secondary.
>
>How is your recovery going?
Well, it's going. Kind of.
I really need to make an update post. Of course, things are so in
flux that it's hard to do. I'll probably get one out before the end
of the month.
>I wish you well with that.
Thank you. Just knowing that people care enough to send their best
wishes helps a lot (there was an article on msnbc.com that reported a
study that indicated that actual outcomes were affected).
--
"Quantum particles: the dreams that stuff is made of."
- David Moser |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Edward M. Kennedy
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:22 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
"David V. Loewe, Jr" wrote
> Thank you. Just knowing that people care enough to send their best
> wishes helps a lot (there was an article on msnbc.com that reported a
> study that indicated that actual outcomes were affected).
Religion has a similar affect. I guess it don't matter if your friends are
real or imaginary.
--Tedward |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dan Bretta
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:30 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Feb 20, 11:25 am, "Ben Stewart" wrote:
> "Peach" wrote in message
>
> @i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 20, 8:22 am, btpage0...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > Musical acts that have lasted, gotten grammy noms etc. But the
> > question is, did they start off relevant and cowtow to the industry,
> > or did they get better with age? Discuss the following:
>
> > Foo Fighters: Monkey Wrench----The Pretender
> >>> I still think they kick ass, but hey, that's just me.
>
> IAWTP.
>
> I love the Foo. I think they are the best ppure rock band out there right
> now. Their live shows are awesome.
>
Yep...I saw them many years back with the RHCP. Dave Grohl climbed up
the seats where I was sitting grabbed a guys beer, chugged it and then
spit it out all over us. Not my favorite moment of the show, but it
still kicked ass.
Dan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David V. Loewe, Jr
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:04 pm Post subject: Re: Musical acts standing the test of time, or wimping out? |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:26:40 -0800 (PST), btpage0630@yahoo.com wrote:
>On Feb 20, 3:25 pm, "David V. Loewe, Jr"
>wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:39:07 -0500, E.F. Hokie wrote:
>> >On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:17:00 -0600, David V. Loewe, Jr wrote...
>>
>> >> >> Weird Al Yankovic: Weird---Weird with some musical talent
>>
>> >> >Does it matter?
>>
>> >> I feel *old*.
>>
>> >You've only got two options, David.
>>
>> >Getting older is the better of the two.
>>
>> Who are you? And, have you been around here lately?
>>
>> I ask because of "recent" (starting in August) posts I have made about
>> my physical condition. I need to know how much I have to fill you in
>> on. There are three options - dying (your unspoken one), getting ill
>> and (just) getting older. My 68 year old father is, in most ways,
>> better off physically than I am because I'm sick and he's not.
>>
>Dude. MOST people don't read every post.
Brent, I believe I saw a recent post asking this particular poster
where he had been - making it possible that he hadn't been around for
any of my announcements.
>I've had several back and
>forths with you and I have no idea what you are talking about.
I have tumors.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroendocrine_tumors
They aren't quite cancer, but medically lay people (and, frankly, many
of the doctors as well) call it "cancer" for short hand.
So, I have "cancer." It was discovered when I went into the ER on
July 31st with very bad left side pain. The pain was from kidney
stones, but when they did the confirming CT scan for that, they
discovered this as well.
It had spread from my pancreas to my liver. I had an operation on the
27th of September to remove the main tumor, a liver tumor, my spleen,
my gall bladder and to fry (Radio Frequency Ablation) several of the
other liver tumors. there are still tumors left.
I then had a pretty bad post-op infection. See
and
for more information.
It's even kind of On Topic as I was watching OU vs ISU when the
incision blew.
Once that was vanquished, I was supposed to heal up in preparation for
oncology to set up a treatment regimen. However, during January, a
spot developed on my chest at the top of the sternum incision (my
torso now has a giant Mercedes-Benz TriStar or, as my buddies call it,
flux capacitor carved on it) that turned red, scabbed over and then
opened up as an open wound.
I had an oncology appointment the day after the Super Bowl and the
oncologist said it was more aggressive than we thought (keep this in
mind for when I post the new update). And, that basically brings you
up to speed (at least as far as I have previously posted here) on what
I'm talking about.
--
"Few people think more than two or three times a year; I have made an
international reputation for myself by thinking once or twice a week."
- George Bernard Shaw
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Related Topics: | Musical Performers that.. You'd rather switch radio stations than listen to: 1) Hall and Oates. I can't really describe why, but I just can't stand any of their music. 2) Bruce Springsteen. I realize he's popular, but I just don't get it. I find his music annoying, at best. 3)
For the First Time in About a Decade... ....I had a PB&J for lunch. Pretty damn good. Jon
TEst Test. -- "Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955) -- "Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society" Mark Twain
Test X-No-Archive: Test
Test Testing this free usenet server for posting .... -- jim_vh |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|