Mihos...WTF???

Jon Enslin · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 72

Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
you aren't?

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212

"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
any other galaxy."

He's a "hot name?"

It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.

Jon

Archived from group: rec>sport>football>college

Bill Lang · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 54

On Mon 18 Feb 2008 05:22:45p, Jon Enslin (jenslin@charter.net)
wrote

> Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning
> Quarterback and you aren't?
>
> http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/08021
> 2
>
> "Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the
> hot names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper.
> The paper predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe
> will have expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated
> to such speeds, that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way,
> will not be able to see any other galaxy."
>
> He's a "hot name?"
>
> It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.
>
> Jon

Write a few books about Star Trek and you garner the attention of
geeks and dorks world wide.

--
wjlmuttatyeahwhodotcom

"I before E except after C, and E before N in chicken"

John Rogers · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 152

Jon Enslin . we live in a world that has walls,
and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do
it? You? You, Jon Enslin ?

>Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
>you aren't?
>
>http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212
>
>"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
>names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
>predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
>expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
>that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
>any other galaxy."
>
>He's a "hot name?"
>
>It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.

If we only saw the stars in our OWN galaxy, the sky would still be
darned full of stars though, right?

John Rogers
AU Class of 1985
The Al Del Greco of Atlanta

"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very
well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive,
we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build
your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a
gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will
follow ours." (General Sir Charles Napier)

Chris Mihos · Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 30

On Feb 18, 9:02 pm, John Rogers wrote:
> Jon Enslin . we live in a world that has walls,
> and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do
> it? You? You, Jon Enslin ?
>
> >Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
> >you aren't?
>
> >http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212
>
> >"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
> >names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
> >predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
> >expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
> >that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
> >any other galaxy."
>
> >He's a "hot name?"
>
> >It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.
>
> If we only saw the stars in our OWN galaxy, the sky would still be
> darned full of stars though, right?

*now*, yes.

in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
our own sun will have died out well before *that*.

such is life.

Melvin Purvis · Joined: 15 Nov 2007 Posts: 17

On Feb 18, 9:23 pm, Chris Mihos wrote:
> On Feb 18, 9:02 pm, John Rogers wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jon Enslin . we live in a world that has walls,
> > and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do
> > it? You? You, Jon Enslin ?
>
> > >Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
> > >you aren't?
>
> > >http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212
>
> > >"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
> > >names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
> > >predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
> > >expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
> > >that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
> > >any other galaxy."
>
> > >He's a "hot name?"
>
> > >It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.
>
> > If we only saw the stars in our OWN galaxy, the sky would still be
> > darned full of stars though, right?
>
> *now*, yes.
>
> in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
> have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
> being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
> our own sun will have died out well before *that*.
>
> such is life.

Can y'all say 'heat death'?

unclejr · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 4

On Feb 18, 8:23 pm, Chris Mihos wrote:
> in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
> have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
> being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
> our own sun will have died out well before *that*.

I find it interesting that when our sun dies, it will EXPAND past
Earth's orbit, and Earth will burn out long before it ever gets cold.

-Junior

Trent Woodruff · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 360

>On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:23:28 -0800 (PST), Chris Mihos wrote:

>in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
>have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
>being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
>our own sun will have died out well before *that*.
>such is life.

Maybe I wouldn't like your book.

--

....I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When
you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I
dismiss yours.
- Stephen Roberts

John Rogers · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 152

Chris Mihos . we live in a world that has walls, and
those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do it?
You? You, Chris Mihos ?

>On Feb 18, 9:02 pm, John Rogers wrote:
>> Jon Enslin . we live in a world that has walls,
>> and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do
>> it? You? You, Jon Enslin ?
>>
>> >Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
>> >you aren't?
>>
>> >http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212
>>
>> >"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
>> >names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
>> >predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
>> >expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
>> >that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
>> >any other galaxy."
>>
>> >He's a "hot name?"
>>
>> >It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.
>>
>> If we only saw the stars in our OWN galaxy, the sky would still be
>> darned full of stars though, right?
>
>*now*, yes.
>
>in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
>have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
>being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
>our own sun will have died out well before *that*.
>
>such is life.

c'est la vie del sol

John Rogers
AU Class of 1985
The Al Del Greco of Atlanta

"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very
well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive,
we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build
your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a
gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will
follow ours." (General Sir Charles Napier)

Archie Leach · Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 14

John Rogers wrote:

>Chris Mihos . we live in a world that has walls, and
>those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do it?
>You? You, Chris Mihos ?
>
>>On Feb 18, 9:02 pm, John Rogers wrote:
>>> Jon Enslin . we live in a world that has walls,
>>> and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do
>>> it? You? You, Jon Enslin ?
>>>
>>> >Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
>>> >you aren't?
>>>
>>> >http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212
>>>
>>> >"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
>>> >names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
>>> >predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
>>> >expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
>>> >that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
>>> >any other galaxy."
>>>
>>> >He's a "hot name?"
>>>
>>> >It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.
>>>
>>> If we only saw the stars in our OWN galaxy, the sky would still be
>>> darned full of stars though, right?
>>
>>*now*, yes.
>>
>>in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
>>have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
>>being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
>>our own sun will have died out well before *that*.
>>
>>such is life.
>
>c'est la vie del sol

Cheese.......................eating surrender monkey.

Dennis J · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 28

hey, Chris Mihos , all the best songs are ABBA songs
and you had to say????...

>On Feb 18, 9:02 pm, John Rogers wrote:
>> Jon Enslin . we live in a world that has walls,
>> and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do
>> it? You? You, Jon Enslin ?
>>
>> >Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
>> >you aren't?
>>
>> >http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212
>>
>> >"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
>> >names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
>> >predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
>> >expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
>> >that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
>> >any other galaxy."
>>
>> >He's a "hot name?"
>>
>> >It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.
>>
>> If we only saw the stars in our OWN galaxy, the sky would still be
>> darned full of stars though, right?
>
>*now*, yes.
>
>in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
>have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
>being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
>our own sun will have died out well before *that*.
>
>such is life.
sure make predictions far out into the future... either you will be a
Genius for figuring it out or you'll be so long gone and dead, no one
will care....

Bring on the next ICE AGE!!! in 3035!!!
---

"the Democrat and Republican parties are destroying our country right now,They're destroying our political process." Jesse Ventura
"Education is the progressive discover of our own Ignorance" Will Durant
"people who read the Tabloids deserve to be lied to" Jerry Sienfeld
"One can't have a sense of perspective without a sense of Humor"
"Don't waste a minute not being happy. If one window closes, run to the next window - or break down a door." -- Brooke Shields
"the Glass is not only half full, it has been delicious so far!!" -- ME

To reply, SCRAPE off the end bits.

Jon Enslin · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 72

On Feb 18, 8:23 pm, Chris Mihos wrote:
> On Feb 18, 9:02 pm, John Rogers wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jon Enslin . we live in a world that has walls,
> > and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do
> > it? You? You, Jon Enslin ?
>
> > >Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
> > >you aren't?
>
> > >http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212
>
> > >"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
> > >names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
> > >predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
> > >expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
> > >that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
> > >any other galaxy."
>
> > >He's a "hot name?"
>
> > >It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.
>
> > If we only saw the stars in our OWN galaxy, the sky would still be
> > darned full of stars though, right?
>
> *now*, yes.
>
> in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
> have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
> being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
> our own sun will have died out well before *that*.
>
> such is life.

Isn't there a constant regeneration of stars due to supernovas and the
like?

Also, at some time wouldn't there have to be a Big Contraction back
from the Big Bang, or is the momentum of the BB enough to overcome
gravity indefinately?

Jon

Edward M. Kennedy · Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 75

"unclejr" wrote

> I find it interesting that when our sun dies, it will EXPAND past
> Earth's orbit, and Earth will burn out long before it ever gets cold.

They aren't entirely sure how much the sun will expand, but this
is a possibly. The Earth gets cooked either way.

--Tedward

Chris Mihos · Joined: 06 Dec 2007 Posts: 30

On Feb 19, 8:46 am, Jon Enslin wrote:
> On Feb 18, 8:23 pm, Chris Mihos wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 9:02 pm, John Rogers wrote:
>
> > > Jon Enslin . we live in a world that has walls,
> > > and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do
> > > it? You? You, Jon Enslin ?
>
> > > >Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
> > > >you aren't?
>
> > > >http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212
>
> > > >"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
> > > >names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
> > > >predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
> > > >expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
> > > >that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
> > > >any other galaxy."
>
> > > >He's a "hot name?"
>
> > > >It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.
>
> > > If we only saw the stars in our OWN galaxy, the sky would still be
> > > darned full of stars though, right?
>
> > *now*, yes.
>
> > in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
> > have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
> > being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
> > our own sun will have died out well before *that*.
>
> > such is life.
>
> Isn't there a constant regeneration of stars due to supernovas and the
> like?

That can extend the star-forming lifecycle of the galaxy somewhat, but
the timescales we're talking about here (trillions of years) are much
much beyond that.

> Also, at some time wouldn't there have to be a Big Contraction back
> from the Big Bang,

nope.

> or is the momentum of the BB enough to overcome
> gravity indefinately?

if you believe the "dark energy" stuff, the expansion of the universe
is accelerating with time, so no recollapse.

and if you don't believe that, then there's still not enough mass in
the universe to overcome the current expansion rate.

so either way, no recollapse of the universe.

Jon Enslin · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 72

On Feb 19, 10:26 am, Chris Mihos wrote:
> On Feb 19, 8:46 am, Jon Enslin wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 8:23 pm, Chris Mihos wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 18, 9:02 pm, John Rogers wrote:
>
> > > > Jon Enslin . we live in a world that has walls,
> > > > and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do
> > > > it? You? You, Jon Enslin ?
>
> > > > >Your colleague at Case is mentioned in Tuesday Morning Quarterback and
> > > > >you aren't?
>
> > > > >http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/080212
>
> > > > >"Lawrence Krauss of Case Western Reserve University, one of the hot
> > > > >names in physics, is first author of this fascinating paper. The paper
> > > > >predicts that 3 trillion years from now, the universe will have
> > > > >expanded to such vastness, and its edges accelerated to such speeds,
> > > > >that an observer in our galaxy, the Milky Way, will not be able to see
> > > > >any other galaxy."
>
> > > > >He's a "hot name?"
>
> > > > >It's time to step up or polish up the ole vitae.
>
> > > > If we only saw the stars in our OWN galaxy, the sky would still be
> > > > darned full of stars though, right?
>
> > > *now*, yes.
>
> > > in 3 trillion years, all the stars existing in the galaxy today will
> > > have died out, and by that time there will likely be no new stars
> > > being formed, and so the night sky will be very dark indeed. of course
> > > our own sun will have died out well before *that*.
>
> > > such is life.
>
> > Isn't there a constant regeneration of stars due to supernovas and the
> > like?
>
> That can extend the star-forming lifecycle of the galaxy somewhat, but
> the timescales we're talking about here (trillions of years) are much
> much beyond that.
>
> > Also, at some time wouldn't there have to be a Big Contraction back
> > from the Big Bang,
>
> nope.
>
> > or is the momentum of the BB enough to overcome
> > gravity indefinately?
>
> if you believe the "dark energy" stuff, the expansion of the universe
> is accelerating with time, so no recollapse.
>
> and if you don't believe that, then there's still not enough mass in
> the universe to overcome the current expansion rate.
>
> so either way, no recollapse of the universe.

See, this is all very depressing. It means that eventually all there
is going to be is a bunch of cold, dark atoms contantly moving away
from one another. Philosophically disturbing.

Jon

Edward M. Kennedy · Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 75

"Chris Mihos" wrote.

> so either way, no recollapse of the universe.

I demand a recount.

--Tedward

Well, that' s ONE draft in the toilet .... Note to self: Cut back on the whiskey intake before draft nights. After promising myself I wouldn't touch Gates with a 10 foot pole, I accidentally picked him in the 4th round... My roster after 6 rounds thus far, 1/2/3/1/1/1, 12 teams, 18 rounds, best b

last saints game prediction for the year Bears - 24 Saints - 17

Sux to be a Volunteer Fan .... Again! Could be worse, I suppose. Could be a Wolverine or a Touchdown Jesus freak. And what's up with Jesus anyway? Many say he is mighty, but others question his existence. Sounds kinda like the Michigan defense if you ask me. Teams to watch in the SEC: Kentuck

Picks: Make your picks for Week 10 (2007)! You know the drill! ;-)

SBXLII - Pick'em - Round 2