|
| Author |
Message |
Kevin LaBerge
Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:04 am Post subject: Refs back on Stealers jocks. |
|
|
Stealers WR grabs defenders facemask and the defender gets a pass
interference called on him. Of course it was 4th and goal, for the go-ahead
TD. The NFL refs are simply pathetic.
Archived from group: alt>sports>football>pro>sea-seahawks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Squidly
Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:10 am Post subject: Re: Refs back on Stealers jocks. |
|
|
On Jan 5, 11:04 pm, "Kevin LaBerge" wrote:
> Stealers WR grabs defenders facemask and the defender gets a pass
> interference called on him. Of course it was 4th and goal, for the go-ahead
> TD. The NFL refs are simply pathetic.
It *was* PI, so try not to feel too torn up over it.
BillB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Squidly
Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:34 am Post subject: Re: Refs back on Stealers jocks. |
|
|
On Jan 5, 11:42 pm, "Peter Reggio" wrote:
> Pretty much...the facemask occurred while the receiver was heading into
> the end-zone...and is most likely WHY the defender retaliated. But the refs
> don't have the abiltity to see that...they're wearing their "help the
> Stealers no matter what" glasses.
I didn't see it that way.
And non-linemen offensive players rarely get called for facemasks
unless
they yank and pull someone down by it.
BillB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Reggio
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:45 am Post subject: Re: Refs back on Stealers jocks. |
|
|
"Squidly" wrote in message @e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 5, 11:42 pm, "Peter Reggio" wrote:
> Pretty much...the facemask occurred while the receiver was heading into
> the end-zone...and is most likely WHY the defender retaliated. But the
> refs
> don't have the abiltity to see that...they're wearing their "help the
> Stealers no matter what" glasses.
I didn't see it that way.
And non-linemen offensive players rarely get called for facemasks
unless
they yank and pull someone down by it.
So, it's ok because they don't usually call it...sort of like it was ok
for Vilma to poke that guy in the eye...hell, they caught it several days
after the fact, so that should be enough for the common viewer, right?
Regis
BillB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Larry Apolonio
Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:47 am Post subject: Re: Refs back on Stealers jocks. |
|
|
Squidly wrote:
> On Jan 5, 11:42 pm, "Peter Reggio" wrote:
>
>> Pretty much...the facemask occurred while the receiver was heading into
>> the end-zone...and is most likely WHY the defender retaliated. But the refs
>> don't have the abiltity to see that...they're wearing their "help the
>> Stealers no matter what" glasses.
>
> I didn't see it that way.
>
> And non-linemen offensive players rarely get called for facemasks
> unless
> they yank and pull someone down by it.
>
>
> BillB
What was nice is they took the lead got their hopes up then lost. So
they go home with their hearts in their stomachs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Squidly
Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:00 am Post subject: Re: Refs back on Stealers jocks. |
|
|
On Jan 6, 12:45 am, "Peter Reggio" wrote:
> "Squidly" wrote in message
> I didn't see it that way.
>
> And non-linemen offensive players rarely get called for facemasks
> unless
> they yank and pull someone down by it.
>
> So, it's ok because they don't usually call it...sort of like it was ok
> for Vilma to poke that guy in the eye...hell, they caught it several days
> after the fact, so that should be enough for the common viewer, right?
>
> Regis
> BillB
Your quotes are all screwed up.
BillB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter Reggio
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 6:03 am Post subject: Re: Refs back on Stealers jocks. |
|
|
"Squidly" wrote in message @s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 6, 12:45 am, "Peter Reggio" wrote:
> "Squidly" wrote in message
> I didn't see it that way.
>
> And non-linemen offensive players rarely get called for facemasks
> unless
> they yank and pull someone down by it.
>
> So, it's ok because they don't usually call it...sort of like it was ok
> for Vilma to poke that guy in the eye...hell, they caught it several days
> after the fact, so that should be enough for the common viewer, right?
>
> Regis
> BillB
Your quotes are all screwed up.
BillB
But my facts are good.
Regis |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Squidly
Joined: 07 Aug 2007 Posts: 47
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:22 pm Post subject: Re: Refs back on Stealers jocks. |
|
|
On Jan 7, 2:30 am, "falcon83" wrote:
> Unless you are a Seahawk receiver. Check the replay on the second
> Washington interception on Saturday. Two defenders on the play, one
> intercepts the pass the other basically tackles the Seahawk receiver while
> the ball is still in the air. No flag.
I'll have to check it again, but I'd bet that the league
would say that the contact happened as the interception was
occuring, and as such, constituted a block rather than PI.
It worked out like a punt, thankfully. We got the ball back around
the 40 and scored.
BillB
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|