Want a look at this NG's stats?

John · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 1

http://netscan.research.microsoft.com/

Enter Vikings at "Find groups where name", mark "contains" if it isn't
already selected. Play with the dates, you can see profiles of the
posters...

It's always a month or so behind, but that's understandable considering the
amount of data.

If you check The Troll you'll note that this "clean up crew" is actually
winning. The troll's posts are down about 2/3 from the month prior. Who said
it wouldn't work???

John

Archived from group: alt>sports>football>mn-vikings

Wouldbeapacker · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 1

>If you check The Troll you'll note that this "clean up crew" is actually
>winning. The troll's posts are down about 2/3 from the month prior. Who said
>it wouldn't work???

There are less posts for "troll" to respond. "Troll" and "troll-busters" are
winning, eveyone else loses. I suggest they take it to alt.pheonixcardinals
and leave the vikings group to viking fans?

Tammy · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 3

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 20:07:46 -0500, "John" wrote:

>http://netscan.research.microsoft.com/
>
>Enter Vikings at "Find groups where name", mark "contains" if it isn't
>already selected. Play with the dates, you can see profiles of the
>posters...

Very interesting, John.

>It's always a month or so behind, but that's understandable considering the
>amount of data.
>
>If you check The Troll you'll note that this "clean up crew" is actually
>winning. The troll's posts are down about 2/3 from the month prior. Who said
>it wouldn't work???

I can think of at least one person.

Tammy
http://www.bumperpugs.1colony.com
This web site about Pugs and is
under construction. If you're one
of those people who gets
annoyed by that, don't visit. Smile

Tammy · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 3

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 20:07:46 -0500, "John" wrote:

>http://netscan.research.microsoft.com/
>
>Enter Vikings at "Find groups where name", mark "contains" if it isn't
>already selected. Play with the dates, you can see profiles of the
>posters...
>
>It's always a month or so behind, but that's understandable considering the
>amount of data.
>
>If you check The Troll you'll note that this "clean up crew" is actually
>winning. The troll's posts are down about 2/3 from the month prior. Who said
>it wouldn't work???

BTW, Dan posted to alt.rushlimbaugh? LOL! I wonder what he said
there! I'm sure Dan *despises* Rush! Smile

(This was in no way meant
to start a political discussion and I will not engage in one)

Tammy
http://www.bumperpugs.1colony.com
This web site about Pugs and is
under construction. If you're one
of those people who gets
annoyed by that, don't visit. Smile

Sir Francis · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 2

Uh this time of the year there is always less football posting ONCE the
season starts again posting will increase. BTW my numbers will probably
never be that huge because I have made my points re: Tice and Co etc so
unless a lot of new stuff happens I would only end up repeating stuff -
none of my posting behaviour has anything to do with any other posters
on here

Draft Deja Vu Vikes Do It Again National Laughingstock

Mike Tice: "I didn't ask (the ref) if he (OT McKinnie) had to report."
This coming from a man who played TE and was an OL coach for over 10
years. Not only should he have known, how could he not know?

http://interactive.rogers.com/SirFrancis/VikingsFAQs

McDLT · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 1

Hahaha that is the funniest thing I've heard you say. "I would only end up
repeating stuff " OMG that is ALL you do. Without repeating the same mantra
"Tice is bad. Denny is god." you wouldnt have anything left to post.

"Sir Francis" wrote in message@storefull-1903.public.rogers.webtv.net...
> Uh this time of the year there is always less football posting ONCE the
> season starts again posting will increase. BTW my numbers will probably
> never be that huge because I have made my points re: Tice and Co etc so
> unless a lot of new stuff happens I would only end up repeating stuff -
> none of my posting behaviour has anything to do with any other posters
> on here
>
>
>
> Draft Deja Vu Vikes Do It Again National Laughingstock
>
>
> Mike Tice: "I didn't ask (the ref) if he (OT McKinnie) had to report."
> This coming from a man who played TE and was an OL coach for over 10
> years. Not only should he have known, how could he not know?
>
>
> http://interactive.rogers.com/SirFrancis/VikingsFAQs
>

Tarkinator · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 1

SirFrancis@interactive.rogers.com (Sir Francis) wrote in message news:...
> Uh this time of the year there is always less football posting ONCE the
> season starts again posting will increase. BTW my numbers will probably
> never be that huge because I have made my points re: Tice and Co etc so
> unless a lot of new stuff happens I would only end up repeating stuff -
> none of my posting behaviour has anything to do with any other posters
> on here

No, he was referring to your posting stats specifically, not the
volume of posts for the whole group.

The Truth · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 2

"Sir Francis" wrote in message@storefull-1903.public.rogers.webtv.net...
> Uh this time of the year there is always less football posting ONCE the
> season starts again posting will increase.

How the hell would you know? You've only been here since November.

> BTW my numbers will probably
> never be that huge because I have made my points

You mean you aren't going to post 143 messages on a single day like you did
on Dec. 2nd? One post a day is one too many from you.

> re: Tice and Co etc so
> unless a lot of new stuff happens I would only end up repeating stuff -

WTF are you talking about? All you do is repeat yourself in here. Everyone
who has seen your bullshit posts knows that. Why deny reality? It just
makes you all the more FOOLISH (if that's possible).

> none of my posting behaviour has anything to do with any other posters
> on here

Your posting behavior has everything to do with mental illness.

Get it?

Viker 44 · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 5

>From: "John" John

>http://netscan.research.microsoft.com/
>Enter Vikings at "Find groups where name", mark "contains" if it isn't
>already selected. Play with the dates, you can see profiles of the
>posters...
>It's always a month or so behind, but that's understandable considering the
>amount of data.
>If you check The Troll you'll note that this "clean up crew" is actually
>winning. The troll's posts are down about 2/3 from the month prior. Who said
>it wouldn't work???
>John

But check all the reposts of tarks that are making up for his downturn in
volume..... say, if you are right and he leaves because of this tactic, I'll
be the first to admit I'm wrong..... but these stats prove nothing..... why
would tark waste his time with the multitude of posts, when he can get others
to post and repost his material for him???

------------
sue the bitch.......

Viker 44 · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 5

>From: Tammy

>On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 20:07:46 -0500, "John" wrote:
>>http://netscan.research.microsoft.com/
>>Enter Vikings at "Find groups where name", mark "contains" if it isn't
>>already selected. Play with the dates, you can see profiles of the
>>posters...

>Very interesting, John.

>>It's always a month or so behind, but that's understandable considering the
>>amount of data.
>>If you check The Troll you'll note that this "clean up crew" is actually
>>winning. The troll's posts are down about 2/3 from the month prior. Who said
>>it wouldn't work???

>I can think of at least one person.
>Tammy

I can think of more than one..... here's the current stats (actually there
are more on the top list that I haven't included, just haven't kept it up to
date):

Regs who say the "tark busting" method will not work and has driven more regs
out:

Viker 44
Zach
Zog
John Viveiros
Snowlock
WiScottsin
Minniman

Regs who say that the "tark busting" works or will work include:

Ed McSweeney
John Schafer
Tammy
Ron Gibson
John/John

------------
sue the bitch.......

NJ Vike · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 1

I wouldn't be surprised if every ISP cancels the subscription to this NG
(cough)

Ken

"Viker 44" wrote in message@mb-m16.aol.com...
> >From: Tammy
>
> >On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 20:07:46 -0500, "John" wrote:
> >>http://netscan.research.microsoft.com/
> >>Enter Vikings at "Find groups where name", mark "contains" if it isn't
> >>already selected. Play with the dates, you can see profiles of the
> >>posters...
>
> >Very interesting, John.
>
> >>It's always a month or so behind, but that's understandable considering
the
> >>amount of data.
> >>If you check The Troll you'll note that this "clean up crew" is actually
> >>winning. The troll's posts are down about 2/3 from the month prior. Who
said
> >>it wouldn't work???
>
> >I can think of at least one person.
> >Tammy
>
> I can think of more than one..... here's the current stats (actually
there
> are more on the top list that I haven't included, just haven't kept it up
to
> date):
>
> Regs who say the "tark busting" method will not work and has driven more
regs
> out:
>
> Viker 44
> Zach
> Zog
> John Viveiros
> Snowlock
> WiScottsin
> Minniman
>
> Regs who say that the "tark busting" works or will work include:
>
> Ed McSweeney
> John Schafer
> Tammy
> Ron Gibson
> John/John
>
>
> ------------
> sue the bitch.......
>

Viker 44 · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 5

>From: "NJ Vike"

>I wouldn't be surprised if every ISP cancels the subscription to this NG
>(cough)
>
>Ken

Hell, we make the Art Bell ng look sane by comparison........

------------
sue the bitch.......

John Viveiros · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 1

I didn't see this original post. No, you're aren't KF'd Viker, but I
just wasn't following the thread. [According to a couple of earlier
trolls, that kind of stuff just can't happen.] Comments below.

> "Viker 44" wrote in message
> @mb-m16.aol.com...
>> Regs who say the "tark busting" method will not work and has
>> driven more regs out:
>>
>> Viker 44
>> Zach
>> Zog
>> John Viveiros
>> Snowlock
>> WiScottsin
>> Minniman
>>
>> Regs who say that the "tark busting" works or will work include:
>>
>> Ed McSweeney
>> John Schafer
>> Tammy
>> Ron Gibson
>> John/John

I notice that the two lists are different indeed. I don't think anyone
on the top list was personally attacked by Tark/Sir Francis, but at
least a couple on the bottom list were. I do still believe the Tark
busters did more harm than good, but I can say with certainty that the
very good people on the second list feel justified in "tark busting",
and I can't be sure I'd feel differently than them if I was the subject
of a lasting attack.

Oh, it actually helps to take Tark off my killfile now, because now I
can see which threads are degenerating, rather than go through dozens
of reposts which show no original message on my software (the very
versatile "XNEWS"). I can pop open the thread title, see who has
responded to who, and can ignore the branches that go Tark-Anti Tark-
Tark-Viker-Tark-Gibson-Tark (for example). You just know what that's
going to be like (nothing against Viker and Ron in this example - I
just know I don't need to read what's going on). Otherwise, I'd have
lone threads from Viker and Gibson that I'd look at, and then I'd be
catching the whole flame war inadvertantly.
--
John Viveiros
xxjjv4xx@prodigy.net
remove the x's to reply

Geoff Gass · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 3

John Viveiros wrote:
> Oh, it actually helps to take Tark off my killfile now, because now I
> can see which threads are degenerating, rather than go through dozens
> of reposts which show no original message on my software (the very
> versatile "XNEWS"). I can pop open the thread title, see who has
> responded to who, and can ignore the branches that go Tark-Anti Tark-
> Tark-Viker-Tark-Gibson-Tark (for example). You just know what that's
> going to be like (nothing against Viker and Ron in this example - I
> just know I don't need to read what's going on). Otherwise, I'd have
> lone threads from Viker and Gibson that I'd look at, and then I'd be
> catching the whole flame war inadvertantly.

I dunno. I kill based on reference, so once he enters a thread, I don't see
what's beyond it on that branch. v.nice.

jschaf01 · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 1

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 15:42:57 +0000 (UTC), Geoff Gass
wrote:

>John Viveiros wrote:
>> Oh, it actually helps to take Tark off my killfile now, because now I
>> can see which threads are degenerating, rather than go through dozens
>> of reposts which show no original message on my software (the very
>> versatile "XNEWS"). I can pop open the thread title, see who has
>> responded to who, and can ignore the branches that go Tark-Anti Tark-
>> Tark-Viker-Tark-Gibson-Tark (for example). You just know what that's
>> going to be like (nothing against Viker and Ron in this example - I
>> just know I don't need to read what's going on). Otherwise, I'd have
>> lone threads from Viker and Gibson that I'd look at, and then I'd be
>> catching the whole flame war inadvertantly.
>
>I dunno. I kill based on reference, so once he enters a thread, I don't see
>what's beyond it on that branch. v.nice.

The problem with that is there are often many other posts in the
thread by regs that you end up missing out on.

Jonathan Schafer

Trivia - Who's stats are these? 17 of 21, (81%) for 235yrds 3TDs, 0 Ints, 152.9 Passer rating...1 sack. Currently on the roster.

McNabb stats Donovan McNabb attempted 48 passes for an average gain of 3.5 yards. His longest completion, 21 yards, was to a running back. Stretching back to last season, the Eagles have had three consecutive home losses and been outscored 75-20.

Track alumni stats? I'm really thinking of basketball but it could apply to football also. I used to have a web site bookmarked that listed various colleges and you could go in and choose any of that schools alumni that are now in the pros then you could go back at any time

Michigan Coaching Stats Winning percentage: Lloyd Carr: .750 Glenn Schembechler: 775 Number of perfect seasons: Lloyd Carr: 1 Glenn Schembechler: 0 Bowl record: Lloyd Carr: 5-7 .417 Glenn Schembechler: 5-12 .294 Record against Ohio State: Lloyd Carr: 6-6 .500 Glenn Schembechler:

Tom Brady's unbelievable stats this year --- Well, thanks to the following website, we must believe that Tom Brady's stats are real, however unbelievable they've been to-date: Yahoo QB Stats Name Team QBRat 1. Tom Brady NWE ....... 141.8 2. Chad P