anderson's top 11 after week 1

mianderson · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 62

1) USC- I watched part of the game, and while USC won easily of
course, they didn't look as dominating against Idaho as I think some
people thought they might. An easy choice for my #1 though.

2) LSU- The key is how Flynn will play. i think he can be very good,
but he'll have to play better than he did in the first half against
MSU. I think we saw how much Bowe and Davis will be missed early on
this year....Flynn was really locking onto Ducet for much of the first
half.

3) Florida- and really only because they have LSU in baton rouge this
year. If it were the other way around I'd probably reverse the order
of these two.

4) tOSU

5) Oklahoma

6) California- I think ainge is overrated and of course was hyping up
cal for this game all week(and gave the 6 pts to tennessee when that
baby opened. But one particular concerning part for cal in that game
is their horrid pass defense. Tennessee, with what looks to be a
fairly benign offensive team, had too many highly positive plays
against Cal. Also, fulmer is officially om the hot seat.

7) wisconsin- why not?

Cool

Georgia- pretty much the exact type of game wisonsin played
yesterday. Taking a mediocre opponent from the big12 and beating them
down in your own house.

9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.

10) WVU- good team.

11) Texas- coming off a bad end of the season lasy year, and not
exacty impressive in this one.

Archived from group: rec>sport>football>college

Tonawanda Kardex · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 47

On Sep 2, 11:38 am, miander...@students.mcg.edu wrote:

> 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
> impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.

Hello, killfile.

mianderson · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 16

On Sep 2, 11:52 am, Tonawanda Kardex
wrote:
> On Sep 2, 11:38 am, miander...@students.mcg.edu wrote:
>
> > 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
> > impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.
>
> Hello, killfile.

you're everything-michigan hatred is well documented. After one bad
game I'm not going to totally write off a team I believed to be
preseason top 4 or so. I'm waiting to see how they do against
oregon. They lose to oregon, and they'll be out of my poll.

Tonawanda Kardex · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 47

On Sep 2, 11:58 am, mianderson wrote:
> On Sep 2, 11:52 am, Tonawanda Kardex
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 2, 11:38 am, miander...@students.mcg.edu wrote:
>
> > > 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
> > > impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.
>
> > Hello, killfile.
>
> you're everything-michigan hatred is well documented. After one bad
> game I'm not going to totally write off a team I believed to be
> preseason top 4 or so. I'm waiting to see how they do against
> oregon. They lose to oregon, and they'll be out of my poll.

[Damn, why isn't this killfile thing working?!]

I think your idiocy on many topics is well-documented. Besides, I have
always posted how much I like Mike Hart and respect Lloyd Carr, so you
are wrong again. No surprise there.

The Wolverines lost SEVEN starters off a defense that SUCKED at the
end of last season, giving up WAY too many points to BALL STATE (at
home), to Ohio State and to USC. Considering their offense is run by
The Second Coming of John Navarre, why in the hell would ANYONE with a
brain rank the Wolverines higher than 20th to start to season? Henne
was terrible yesterday, against a Division I-AA defense.

They proved they don't belong in the Top 25 by laying the biggest egg
in NCAA history -- but you still keep them in the Top 10.

Well-documented idiocy, indeed.

starcade · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 7

On Sep 2, 8:58 am, mianderson wrote:

> you're everything-michigan hatred is well documented. After one bad
> game I'm not going to totally write off a team I believed to be
> preseason top 4 or so. I'm waiting to see how they do against
> oregon. They lose to oregon, and they'll be out of my poll.

This isn't "one bad game".

This is a signal that it is very possible that Michigan won't be able
to beat six teams this year and will have a very long off-season.

I'd fire the coach right now.

Mike

jimbrowndoc · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 16

On Sep 2, 11:05 am, Tonawanda Kardex
wrote:
> On Sep 2, 11:58 am, mianderson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 2, 11:52 am, Tonawanda Kardex
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 2, 11:38 am, miander...@students.mcg.edu wrote:
>
> > > > 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
> > > > impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.
>
> > > Hello, killfile.
>
> > you're everything-michigan hatred is well documented. After one bad
> > game I'm not going to totally write off a team I believed to be
> > preseason top 4 or so. I'm waiting to see how they do against
> > oregon. They lose to oregon, and they'll be out of my poll.
>
> [Damn, why isn't this killfile thing working?!]
>
> I think your idiocy on many topics is well-documented. Besides, I have
> always posted how much I like Mike Hart and respect Lloyd Carr, so you
> are wrong again. No surprise there.
>
> The Wolverines lost SEVEN starters off a defense that SUCKED at the
> end of last season, giving up WAY too many points to BALL STATE (at
> home), to Ohio State and to USC. Considering their offense is run by
> The Second Coming of John Navarre, why in the hell would ANYONE with a
> brain rank the Wolverines higher than 20th to start to season? Henne
> was terrible yesterday, against a Division I-AA defense.
>
> They proved they don't belong in the Top 25 by laying the biggest egg
> in NCAA history -- but you still keep them in the Top 10.
>
> Well-documented idiocy, indeed.

You just posted yesterday how your season was now made with the one
Mich loss. The idiocy around here comes more often from you then
mianderson.

Jefferson N. Glapski · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 73

wrote in message @22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> 1) USC- I watched part of the game, and while USC won easily of
> course, they didn't look as dominating against Idaho as I think some
> people thought they might. An easy choice for my #1 though.
>
> 2) LSU- The key is how Flynn will play. i think he can be very good,
> but he'll have to play better than he did in the first half against
> MSU. I think we saw how much Bowe and Davis will be missed early on
> this year....Flynn was really locking onto Ducet for much of the first
> half.
>
> 3) Florida- and really only because they have LSU in baton rouge this
> year. If it were the other way around I'd probably reverse the order
> of these two.
>
> 4) tOSU
>
> 5) Oklahoma
>
> 6) California- I think ainge is overrated and of course was hyping up
> cal for this game all week(and gave the 6 pts to tennessee when that
> baby opened. But one particular concerning part for cal in that game
> is their horrid pass defense. Tennessee, with what looks to be a
> fairly benign offensive team, had too many highly positive plays
> against Cal. Also, fulmer is officially om the hot seat.

No. Carr is officially on the hot seat.

> 7) wisconsin- why not?

Because they have a new QB

> Cool

Georgia- pretty much the exact type of game wisonsin played
> yesterday. Taking a mediocre opponent from the big12 and beating them
> down in your own house.
>
> 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
> impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.

No, it all comes down to the Appy State game. Whore. They are out.

> 10) WVU- good team.
>
> 11) Texas- coming off a bad end of the season lasy year, and not
> exacty impressive in this one.

Eric Kemp · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 24

mianderson@students.mcg.edu wrote:

> 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
> impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.

>
> 11) Texas- coming off a bad end of the season lasy year, and not
> exacty impressive in this one.
>

Thank God you don't have a vote in the real polls.

John Rogers · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 152

A flute without holes, is not a flute, jimbrowndoc@yahoo.com... A
donut without a hole is a Danish.

>On Sep 2, 11:05 am, Tonawanda Kardex
>wrote:
>> On Sep 2, 11:58 am, mianderson wrote:
>>
>> > On Sep 2, 11:52 am, Tonawanda Kardex
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > On Sep 2, 11:38 am, miander...@students.mcg.edu wrote:
>>
>> > > > 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
>> > > > impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.
>>
>> > > Hello, killfile.
>>
>> > you're everything-michigan hatred is well documented. After one bad
>> > game I'm not going to totally write off a team I believed to be
>> > preseason top 4 or so. I'm waiting to see how they do against
>> > oregon. They lose to oregon, and they'll be out of my poll.
>>
>> [Damn, why isn't this killfile thing working?!]
>>
>> I think your idiocy on many topics is well-documented. Besides, I have
>> always posted how much I like Mike Hart and respect Lloyd Carr, so you
>> are wrong again. No surprise there.
>>
>> The Wolverines lost SEVEN starters off a defense that SUCKED at the
>> end of last season, giving up WAY too many points to BALL STATE (at
>> home), to Ohio State and to USC. Considering their offense is run by
>> The Second Coming of John Navarre, why in the hell would ANYONE with a
>> brain rank the Wolverines higher than 20th to start to season? Henne
>> was terrible yesterday, against a Division I-AA defense.
>>
>> They proved they don't belong in the Top 25 by laying the biggest egg
>> in NCAA history -- but you still keep them in the Top 10.
>>
>> Well-documented idiocy, indeed.
>
>You just posted yesterday how your season was now made with the one
>Mich loss. The idiocy around here comes more often from you then
>mianderson.

Dude.

John Rogers
AU Class of 1985
The Al Del Greco of Atlanta
The Nail Gun of Quiet Reflection
Deacon Dr. John Flow

"A ship is safe in a harbor. But a harbor is not what a ship is for."

jimbrowndoc · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 16

On Sep 2, 1:46 pm, John Rogers wrote:
> A flute without holes, is not a flute, jimbrown...@yahoo.com... A
> donut without a hole is a Danish.
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Sep 2, 11:05 am, Tonawanda Kardex
> >wrote:
> >> On Sep 2, 11:58 am, mianderson wrote:
>
> >> > On Sep 2, 11:52 am, Tonawanda Kardex
> >> > wrote:
>
> >> > > On Sep 2, 11:38 am, miander...@students.mcg.edu wrote:
>
> >> > > > 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
> >> > > > impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.
>
> >> > > Hello, killfile.
>
> >> > you're everything-michigan hatred is well documented. After one bad
> >> > game I'm not going to totally write off a team I believed to be
> >> > preseason top 4 or so. I'm waiting to see how they do against
> >> > oregon. They lose to oregon, and they'll be out of my poll.
>
> >> [Damn, why isn't this killfile thing working?!]
>
> >> I think your idiocy on many topics is well-documented. Besides, I have
> >> always posted how much I like Mike Hart and respect Lloyd Carr, so you
> >> are wrong again. No surprise there.
>
> >> The Wolverines lost SEVEN starters off a defense that SUCKED at the
> >> end of last season, giving up WAY too many points to BALL STATE (at
> >> home), to Ohio State and to USC. Considering their offense is run by
> >> The Second Coming of John Navarre, why in the hell would ANYONE with a
> >> brain rank the Wolverines higher than 20th to start to season? Henne
> >> was terrible yesterday, against a Division I-AA defense.
>
> >> They proved they don't belong in the Top 25 by laying the biggest egg
> >> in NCAA history -- but you still keep them in the Top 10.
>
> >> Well-documented idiocy, indeed.
>
> >You just posted yesterday how your season was now made with the one
> >Mich loss. The idiocy around here comes more often from you then
> >mianderson.
>
> Dude.
>
> John Rogers

All right, maybe a close second.

Kennedy · Joined: 16 Aug 2007 Posts: 19

wrote in message @22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> 1) USC- I watched part of the game, and while USC won easily of
> course, they didn't look as dominating against Idaho as I think some
> people thought they might. An easy choice for my #1 though.
>
> 2) LSU- The key is how Flynn will play. i think he can be very good,
> but he'll have to play better than he did in the first half against
> MSU. I think we saw how much Bowe and Davis will be missed early on
> this year....Flynn was really locking onto Ducet for much of the first
> half.
>
> 3) Florida- and really only because they have LSU in baton rouge this
> year. If it were the other way around I'd probably reverse the order
> of these two.
>
> 4) tOSU
>
> 5) Oklahoma
>
> 6) California- I think ainge is overrated and of course was hyping up
> cal for this game all week(and gave the 6 pts to tennessee when that
> baby opened. But one particular concerning part for cal in that game
> is their horrid pass defense. Tennessee, with what looks to be a
> fairly benign offensive team, had too many highly positive plays
> against Cal. Also, fulmer is officially om the hot seat.
>
> 7) wisconsin- why not?
>
> Cool

Georgia- pretty much the exact type of game wisonsin played
> yesterday. Taking a mediocre opponent from the big12 and beating them
> down in your own house.
>
> 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
> impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

/breath

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

> 10) WVU- good team.
>
> 11) Texas- coming off a bad end of the season lasy year, and not
> exacty impressive in this one.

Exactly like Michigan, except they actually won their game....

Tonawanda Kardex · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 47

On Sep 2, 1:13 pm, jimbrown...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Sep 2, 11:05 am, Tonawanda Kardex
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 2, 11:58 am, mianderson wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 2, 11:52 am, Tonawanda Kardex
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > On Sep 2, 11:38 am, miander...@students.mcg.edu wrote:
>
> > > > > 9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
> > > > > impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.
>
> > > > Hello, killfile.
>
> > > you're everything-michigan hatred is well documented. After one bad
> > > game I'm not going to totally write off a team I believed to be
> > > preseason top 4 or so. I'm waiting to see how they do against
> > > oregon. They lose to oregon, and they'll be out of my poll.
>
> > [Damn, why isn't this killfile thing working?!]
>
> > I think your idiocy on many topics is well-documented. Besides, I have
> > always posted how much I like Mike Hart and respect Lloyd Carr, so you
> > are wrong again. No surprise there.
>
> > The Wolverines lost SEVEN starters off a defense that SUCKED at the
> > end of last season, giving up WAY too many points to BALL STATE (at
> > home), to Ohio State and to USC. Considering their offense is run by
> > The Second Coming of John Navarre, why in the hell would ANYONE with a
> > brain rank the Wolverines higher than 20th to start to season? Henne
> > was terrible yesterday, against a Division I-AA defense.
>
> > They proved they don't belong in the Top 25 by laying the biggest egg
> > in NCAA history -- but you still keep them in the Top 10.
>
> > Well-documented idiocy, indeed.
>
> You just posted yesterday how your season was now made with the one
> Mich loss. The idiocy around here comes more often from you then
> mianderson.

Weauxf!

mianderson · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 62

On Sep 2, 2:06 pm, "Jefferson N. Glapski"
wrote:
> > 7) wisconsin- why not?
>
> Because they have a new QB

who actually looks pretty decent. Besides, the passing game wasn't
all that great last year anyways.

What's more important is that they have so many starters returning on
a defense that was pretty darn good last year.

Trent Woodruff · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 360

>On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 08:38:03 -0700, mianderson@students.mcg.edu wrote:

>9) Michigan- It all comes down to the orgeon game. Beat them in
>impressive fashion, and they may jump a little.

That is Homertastic.

(And I think I'm talking about Homer Simpson here...)

....Never think that a handful of committed people can't change the world. In fact, it's the thing that usually has.

Jefferson N. Glapski · Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 73

wrote in message @y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 2, 2:06 pm, "Jefferson N. Glapski"
> wrote:
>> > 7) wisconsin- why not?
>>
>> Because they have a new QB
>
> who actually looks pretty decent. Besides, the passing game wasn't
> all that great last year anyways.
>
> What's more important is that they have so many starters returning on
> a defense that was pretty darn good last year.

A new QB translates into several losses most times.

anderson breaks down week success..... let's see my +/- for the week based on my earlier posted bets: 1) LSU at Miss State- I took Miss State(+11) for a halftime line. Had the game WON when MSU was down only 10-0 with a minute and a half left but then their idiot qb throws a horrid intercepti

WEEK 3 FOR ME!!!

Week 1... Stock up: Tampa Bay. Super Bowl favorites again. Brick is right on not having a great offense, but if you can't score on them and you're Philly, it really makes you wonder who might be able to score on them, since they also proved to be about the only sid

Week 12 in the NFL My picks.

week 1 It’s been a while since I’ve trolled in here, but I wanted to see the thoughts of Raven fan after that game. Here are my comments for what they are worth. 1. I was pleasantly surprised the game went so well for the Steelers. I expect a close g