|
| Author |
Message |
Paco
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 2
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:10 am Post subject: Woodson |
 |
|
Woodson has agreed to contract terms with the Packers.
Archived from group: alt>sports>football>pro>tampabay-bucs |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wittylibrarian
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:59 pm Post subject: Re: Woodson |
|
|
If so, then the Bucs are seriously looking at Safety in the draft, they
got to... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stephen Weihman
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 11:07 pm Post subject: Re: Woodson |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:10:06 GMT, Paco wrote:
>Woodson has agreed to contract terms with the Packers.
And it's an great contract for him. $10.5M the first year, $18 over
the first 3, according to ESPN. No way the Bucs were in that $$$
range.
--
Raise the red flags!
Superbowl XXXVII Champions |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wittylibrarian
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject: Re: Woodson |
|
|
I think the Pack overpaid. I wouldn't have gone past $5 mill the first
year, considering the dropoff in numbers he's had the last 2 years... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stephen Weihman
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:12 am Post subject: Re: Woodson |
|
|
On 26 Apr 2006 17:11:25 -0700, "wittylibrarian@lycos.com"
wrote:
>I think the Pack overpaid. I wouldn't have gone past $5 mill the first
>year, considering the dropoff in numbers he's had the last 2 years...
I agree. He may surprise and return to form. But that's a hell of a
lot to risk on it, IMHO.
--
Raise the red flags!
Superbowl XXXVII Champions |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ron Gibson
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 31
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:27 am Post subject: Re: Woodson |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:12:14 -0500, Stephen Weihman wrote:
>>I think the Pack overpaid. I wouldn't have gone past $5 mill the first
>>year, considering the dropoff in numbers he's had the last 2 years...
> I agree. He may surprise and return to form. But that's a hell of a lot
> to risk on it, IMHO.
Same here. Draft and pay a lot less. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sam
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:36 am Post subject: Re: Woodson |
|
|
Good move by the Bucs -- not signing Woodson...
1. His strength is CB and not safety.
2. He is more a man to man than a cover 2 defender.
3. How many games will he miss by injury?
4. Leaves some cap room to sign other vets for depth (e.g. OL or DL) after
the draft
"Ron Gibson" wrote in message @verizon.net...
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:12:14 -0500, Stephen Weihman wrote:
>
>>>I think the Pack overpaid. I wouldn't have gone past $5 mill the first
>>>year, considering the dropoff in numbers he's had the last 2 years...
>
>> I agree. He may surprise and return to form. But that's a hell of a lot
>> to risk on it, IMHO.
>
> Same here. Draft and pay a lot less. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sam
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:39 am Post subject: Re: Woodson |
|
|
5.Woodson got $45 million bucs????
Woodson Set To Sign With Green Bay
Jay Glazer, of FOXSports.com, reports the Green Bay Packers have reached a
seven-year deal with free agent CB Charles Woodson (Raiders) worth around
$45 million. While the deal has been agreed to, Woodson has yet to sign the
deal.
"sam" wrote in message $d_4.1834@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> Good move by the Bucs -- not signing Woodson...
> 1. His strength is CB and not safety.
> 2. He is more a man to man than a cover 2 defender.
> 3. How many games will he miss by injury?
> 4. Leaves some cap room to sign other vets for depth (e.g. OL or DL) after
> the draft
>
> "Ron Gibson" wrote in message
> @verizon.net...
>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:12:14 -0500, Stephen Weihman wrote:
>>
>>>>I think the Pack overpaid. I wouldn't have gone past $5 mill the first
>>>>year, considering the dropoff in numbers he's had the last 2 years...
>>
>>> I agree. He may surprise and return to form. But that's a hell of a
>>> lot
>>> to risk on it, IMHO.
>>
>> Same here. Draft and pay a lot less.
>
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Geoff
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 12:19 am Post subject: Re: Woodson |
|
|
You gotta wonder how much this signing was influenced by Favre coming back for another year and the Pack trying to reload
for a playoff run. I bet if Brett hadn't said he was coming back that they don't sign Woodson today.
wittylibrarian@lycos.com wrote:
> I think the Pack overpaid. I wouldn't have gone past $5 mill the first
> year, considering the dropoff in numbers he's had the last 2 years...
> |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
james
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 29
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2006 5:40 pm Post subject: Re: Woodson |
|
|
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:36:36 GMT, "sam" wrote:
>+
>+<1. His strength is CB and not safety.
Yes that maybe true.
>+<2. He is more a man to man than a cover 2 defender.
Cover 2 is a zone and a vetern like Woodson can learn to play that
well enough.
>+<3. How many games will he miss by injury?
How many games willa first round pick miss due to injury? Injuries are
difficult to predict. Some players can play with more pain than
others. That is tough to make a judgement on.
>+<4. Leaves some cap room to sign other vets for depth (e.g. OL or DL) after
>+
>+<
Yes that does leave room under the cap. And most likely t here will be
more cap casualties as June approaches. It will be very easy to find a
vet that the Bucs can rent for a year as a backup.
james
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
