yourdomain.com Forum Index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

most outdoor CFL stadiums are laughable

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Football Canada
Author Message
Sweet F.A.



Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:34 pm    Post subject: most outdoor CFL stadiums are laughable Reply with quote

Just wondering why all the outdoor stadiums venues in the CFL (Edmonton,
Calgary, Regina, Winnipeg, Hamilton, Montreal) are "decked sideline" type
stadiums and not "bowl confguration" stadiums like one would find south of
the Canadian border?

I suppose Edmonton's Commonwealth Stadium has a bit of a bowl type
configuration....well, not quite, but almost there, at least at one end.

Using Winnipeg as an example, double decks on each side the length of the
field, and then a half assed attempt at end zone seating at the north end
zone, and temporary bleachers brought in for the south end zone during the
odd Grey Cup event.


Would not a decently designed bowl type configuration be much better for
an outdoor venue (cutting down on the wind drafts and side winds and what
not) ? Not to mention one would not have to build as physically high,
especially for a CFL city, where the average seating capacity is 20,000 to
25,000 seats.

With the exception of Edmonton's Commonwealth Stadium, all the other
outdoor CFL stadiums look so bush league, it's laughable.

Archived from group: rec>sport>football>canadian
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Henchman



Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:24 am    Post subject: Re: most outdoor CFL stadiums are laughable Reply with quote

"Sweet F.A." wrote in message @s01060005020715c5.wp.shawcable.net...
> Just wondering why all the outdoor stadiums venues in the CFL (Edmonton,
> Calgary, Regina, Winnipeg, Hamilton, Montreal) are "decked sideline" type
> stadiums and not "bowl confguration" stadiums like one would find south of
> the Canadian border?
>
> I suppose Edmonton's Commonwealth Stadium has a bit of a bowl type
> configuration....well, not quite, but almost there, at least at one end.
>
> Using Winnipeg as an example, double decks on each side the length of the
> field, and then a half assed attempt at end zone seating at the north end
> zone, and temporary bleachers brought in for the south end zone during the
> odd Grey Cup event.
>
>
> Would not a decently designed bowl type configuration be much better for
> an outdoor venue (cutting down on the wind drafts and side winds and what
> not) ? Not to mention one would not have to build as physically high,
> especially for a CFL city, where the average seating capacity is 20,000 to
> 25,000 seats.
>
> With the exception of Edmonton's Commonwealth Stadium, all the other
> outdoor CFL stadiums look so bush league, it's laughable.

Welcome to small market football league.

Stadiums are the least concern I have. Good athletes, properly paid
athletes, fair rules, no cheating, good refs, affordable tickets and
sustainable and marketable teams are all more important than Stadium
configurations.

Alot of those stadiums in the USA are paid for or subsidized in more than
one way by tax dollars. I don't want MY Canadian cities doing that. My
Tax dollars are to pay for schools and hospitals and police and safe
bridges. Not flashy stadiums.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Matthew D. Sullivan



Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 12:15 am    Post subject: Re: most outdoor CFL stadiums are laughable Reply with quote

Sweet F.A. wrote:
> Just wondering why all the outdoor stadiums venues in the CFL (Edmonton,
> Calgary, Regina, Winnipeg, Hamilton, Montreal) are "decked sideline" type
> stadiums and not "bowl confguration" stadiums like one would find south of
> the Canadian border?

I think because the CFL field is bigger, more seats in "the corners" and
the end zones are less desirable because you can't see much of the
action. Better to sit on the sidelines, even if you're way up.

I think it's less of an issue in the NFL, where in a bowl shaped stadium
you're still pretty close to all of the action, even when you're sitting
in the corners and end zones.

-Matt S.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Glen



Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:09 pm    Post subject: Re: most outdoor CFL stadiums are laughable Reply with quote

On Nov 14, 2:34 am, noem...@nonet.net (Sweet F.A.) wrote:
> Just wondering why all the outdoor stadiums venues in the CFL (Edmonton,
> Calgary, Regina, Winnipeg, Hamilton, Montreal) are "decked sideline" type
> stadiums and not "bowl confguration" stadiums like one would find south of
> the Canadian border?
>


Why, consider when they were built. Take Canad Inns Stadium for
instance, it first opened in 1954 and then with 18-19,000 seats. In
the late 60's to the mid 70's the upper decks were built. At one time
its capacity was about 33,000 and now it's around 29,500.



> I suppose Edmonton's Commonwealth Stadium has a bit of a bowl type
> configuration....well, not quite, but almost there, at least at one end.

Built in time for the 1978 Commonwealth games.


> Using Winnipeg as an example, double decks on each side the length of the
> field, and then a half assed attempt at end zone seating at the north end
> zone, and temporary bleachers brought in for the south end zone during the
> odd Grey Cup event.

I think the end zone seats were part of the original plan.

> Would not a decently designed bowl type configuration be much better for
> an outdoor venue (cutting down on the wind drafts and side winds and what
> not) ? Not to mention one would not have to build as physically high,
> especially for a CFL city, where the average seating capacity is 20,000 to
> 25,000 seats.

Got the $$$?

> With the exception of Edmonton's Commonwealth Stadium, all the other
> outdoor CFL stadiums look so bush league, it's laughable.

See above.


Glen

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Links to NFL Stadiums (2003) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *** NFC South *** Atlanta Falcons

Stadiums, Teams, Fans, Rivalries & Violence? Hi. I just wondered what the biggest stadiums are for NFL teams? Is there a site that lists the capacities of all the stadiums? Also, what would you say are the best teams in NFL history have been? Which teams have won the most things? Which teams have t

NFL Stadiums by Turf Type (2005 version) Name Team Turf Type Edward Jones Dome ...... St. Louis Rams Astroturf RCA Dome Indianapolis Colts .......... Astroturf Ford Field

Super Bowls -- 8 States, 15 Cities, 20 Stadiums --- Super Bowl Future / History Super Bowl Stadiums (History) --- Ranked by State 1. Florida -- 15 2. California -- 11 3. Louisiana -- 9 4. Texas -- 3 5. Arizona -- 2

Someone must take up the job for the Panthers to pepper McRi The panthers will not ever forget what Donovan McRibs did (letting St. Louis into the playoffs). And McRibs will nevah forget what the panthers did to him last year in the conference final game. That is why the Eagles turned chicken because they knew of
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Football Canada All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group