yourdomain.com Forum Index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Spygate penalty

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Professional Football
Author Message
asiddiqu



Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:53 pm    Post subject: Spygate penalty Reply with quote

Throughout the season I heard many people suggest that the penalties
for the Spygate were unprecedently harsh. I agree with Steve Young.
The penalties are not only puny but they actually help the Patriots.
This year's team was retooled with the free agent acquisitions. They
don't have a first round pick in the draft, so they will have couple
of millions available under the cap. Now they can address their needs
in the free agent market again without the constraint of keeping some
money around for a first rounder. Moroney hasn't worked out. I won't
be surprised if Chargers' back up running back Turner signs a big free
agent contract with the Patriots this year.

aslam
GO COLTS!!!

Archived from group: rec>sport>football>pro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tarkus



Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 75

PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:13 am    Post subject: Re: Spygate penalty Reply with quote

asiddiqu@iupui.edu wrote:
> Throughout the season I heard many people suggest that the penalties
> for the Spygate were unprecedently harsh. I agree with Steve Young.
> The penalties are not only puny but they actually help the Patriots.
> This year's team was retooled with the free agent acquisitions. They
> don't have a first round pick in the draft, so they will have couple
> of millions available under the cap. Now they can address their needs
> in the free agent market again without the constraint of keeping some
> money around for a first rounder. Moroney hasn't worked out. I won't
> be surprised if Chargers' back up running back Turner signs a big free
> agent contract with the Patriots this year.

First, they actually still have a first round pick, since they traded
for a second one. Apparently, they thought TWO first round picks were
more important than worrying about the salary cap to pay them.

Second, if it's such a great help to not have first round picks, why
aren't people trading them away for whatever they can get for them, even
if it's squat?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Broncofan



Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:07 am    Post subject: Re: Spygate penalty Reply with quote

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:53:13 -0800 (PST), asiddiqu@iupui.edu wrote:

>Throughout the season I heard many people suggest that the penalties
>for the Spygate were unprecedently harsh. I agree with Steve Young.
>The penalties are not only puny but they actually help the Patriots.
>This year's team was retooled with the free agent acquisitions. They
>don't have a first round pick in the draft, so they will have couple
>of millions available under the cap. Now they can address their needs
>in the free agent market again without the constraint of keeping some
>money around for a first rounder. Moroney hasn't worked out. I won't
>be surprised if Chargers' back up running back Turner signs a big free
>agent contract with the Patriots this year.
>
>aslam
>GO COLTS!!!



No one cares.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    yourdomain.com Forum Index -> Professional Football All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group